UK Parliament / Open data

Scotland Bill

Debate on bills on Wednesday, 24 February 2016, in the House of Lords.
Lords report stage (first day, part two). Clauses 38, 41, Schedule 2 amendments agreed to. Clause 42, amendment disagreed to on division (7 to 22).
Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
769 cc354-385 
Session
2015-16
Department
Scotland Office
Legislative stage
Report stage
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Scotland Bill 2015-16. As amended in Committee.
Monday, 22 February 2016
Bills
House of Lords
Proceeding contributions
Lord Stephen | 769 cc354-8 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I spoke to Clause 35 in Committee. Protection from discrimination and the promotion of ...

Lord McFall of Alcluith | 769 c358 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord McFall of Alcluith

30: Clause 35, line 17, at end insert—

“( ) pr...


Show all contributions (45)
Lord McFall of Alcluith | 769 c359 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Stephen, for speaking to the amendments. We are generally ...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 769 c359 (Link to this contribution)

The noble Lord is making a case for these amendments but, as I understand the Labour Party’s posi...

Lord McFall of Alcluith | 769 cc360-1 (Link to this contribution)

Actually, I remember, at the beginning of the day, the noble Lord being very robust about Clause ...

Lord Dunlop | 769 cc361-2 (Link to this contribution)

I thank noble Lords who have spoken—the noble Lords, Lord Stephen and Lord McFall. These provisio...

Lord Stephen | 769 c362 (Link to this contribution)

I very much welcome the information that the Minister has had consultation with the Scottish Gove...

Lord Dunlop | 769 cc362-3 (Link to this contribution)

The Government consult the Equality and Human Rights Commission on an ongoing basis and I am happ...

Lord Stephen | 769 c363 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I thank the Minister for his response and the Labour Party for supporting these amendme...

Lord Geddes | 769 c363 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, this is a slight technicality but we are in fact discussing Amendment 30 and not Amendm...

Lord Dunlop | 769 c363 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Dunlop

35: Clause 38, page 41, line 28, leave out from “relating” to “t...

Lord Dunlop | 769 c364 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am pleased to move Amendment 35 and to speak to Amendments 36 to 40. In Committee in ...

Lord McFall of Alcluith | 769 cc364-6 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I very much welcome the government amendments on pavement parking. As the Minister just...

Lord Lyell | 769 c366 (Link to this contribution)

Perhaps my noble friend can give me some guidance. I think Amendment 40 is in this group. Referen...

Lord Dunlop | 769 cc366-7 (Link to this contribution)

I am very happy to respond in writing to my noble friend.

I thank the noble Lord, Lord McFa...

Lord Dunlop | 769 c367 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Dunlop

36: Clause 38, page 41, line 30, after first “the” insert “first...

Lord Dunlop | 769 c367 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Dunlop

39: Clause 41, page 45, line 27, leave out subsections (3) to (6...

Lord Dunlop | 769 c368 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Dunlop

40: Schedule 2, page 85, line 20, at end insert—

40: Sched...

Lord Faulkner of Worcester | 769 c369 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Faulkner of Worcester

41: Clause 42, page 46, line 17, at end insert—

Lord Faulkner of Worcester | 769 cc369-371 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, in moving Amendment 41, I shall speak also to Amendments 42, 43 and 44. I express my ap...

Lord McAvoy | 769 cc371-2 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I can understand where my noble friend Lord Faulkner is coming from. Along with the det...

Lord McAvoy | 769 c372 (Link to this contribution)

However, let me deal with those who are. Earlier, the noble and learned Lord, Lord Wallace of Tan...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 769 cc372-3 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I will briefly speak to Amendments 41 and 42. I thank the noble Lord, Lord Faulkner of ...

Earl of Kinnoull | 769 c373 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, the noble Lord is developing a very interesting point. I wonder whether, in doing so, h...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 769 cc373-4 (Link to this contribution)

Indeed, I am familiar with the no-detriment principle, which is that policy changes on either sid...

Lord Empey | 769 cc374-6 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I would like to speak to Amendments 41 and 42, and then move to Amendment 44 standing i...

Earl of Kinnoull | 769 cc377-8 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lords, Lord Faulkner and Lord Empey, for speaking to these a...

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 769 c378 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, paragraph 67 of the Smith commission report states:

“The functions of the British...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 769 c378 (Link to this contribution)

Of course there is also the complicating factor that part of the budget of the British Transport ...

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 769 cc378-9 (Link to this contribution)

The noble Lord is absolutely right, and we aired these concerns when this was debated in Committe...

Earl of Kinnoull | 769 c379 (Link to this contribution)

I think that we would all be very interested to hear the view of the noble and learned Lord on th...

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 769 cc379-380 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, one of the problems is that the no-detriment principle has so far tended to be looked a...

Lord Mackay of Clashfern | 769 c380 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, in my view the words used by the Smith commission on this subject do not imply the brea...

Lord Berkeley | 769 cc380-1 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I support my noble friend Lord Faulkner’s Amendments 41 and 42. I certainly will not re...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 769 c381 (Link to this contribution)

Surely, under the no-detriment principle, what was previously being paid by the transport operato...

Lord Berkeley | 769 cc381-2 (Link to this contribution)

I entirely agree with the noble Lord: that is the way it should be done. The operators in England...

Lord Dunlop | 769 c382 (Link to this contribution)

I particularly thank the noble Lord, Lord Faulkner. He always speaks on railway matters with such...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 769 c382 (Link to this contribution)

I very much hope that the Scottish Conservatives will win more seats at the election but I am not...

Lord Dunlop | 769 cc383-4 (Link to this contribution)

I can assure my noble friend that I will not turn myself into Mystic Meg tonight and make a predi...

Lord Empey | 769 c384 (Link to this contribution)

If I understood the Minister correctly, does he seriously believe that even after efforts have be...

Lord Dunlop | 769 c384 (Link to this contribution)

I will repeat what I said: it is entirely possible to put in place the necessary arrangements to ...

Lord Faulkner of Worcester | 769 cc384-5 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, this has been an extraordinary debate. The hour approaches midnight and we have been de...

Lord Geddes | 769 c385 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, as it appears that fewer than 30 Lords have voted, in accordance with Standing Order No...

Legislation
Scotland Bill 2015-16
Back to top