UK Parliament / Open data

Scotland Bill

Debate on bills on Wednesday, 24 February 2016, in the House of Lords.
Lords report stage (first day, part one). Clauses 3, 5, 10-11, amendments agreed. Clause 34, amendment disagreed to on division (68 to 189).
Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
769 cc272-329 
Session
2015-16
Department
Scotland Office
Legislative stage
Report stage
Procedure
New clauses
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Scotland Bill 2015-16. As amended in Committee.
Monday, 22 February 2016
Bills
House of Lords
Proceeding contributions
Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 769 c272 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean

1: Clause 1, page 1, line 9, after “are” insert “re...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 769 cc272-4 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, we had quite a good discussion about this in Committee. This amendment, together with A...


Show all contributions (134)
Lord Hope of Craighead | 769 c273 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am as disappointed as the noble Lord, Lord Forsyth, that some of the points that were...

Lord Cormack | 769 cc273-5 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, Amendment 3 is in my name. I moved a similar amendment in Committee and expressed the h...

Lord Norton of Louth | 769 cc275-7 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I have added my name to Amendment 2, with that of the noble and learned Lord, Lord Hope...

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 769 c278 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, as the noble and learned Lord, Lord Hope of Craighead, indicated, we had a very lengthy...

Lord McCluskey | 769 c279 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I have simply one question to ask the Minister at this stage. Given the failure of the ...

Lord Empey | 769 c279 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, if I may follow the point just made by the noble Lord, Lord McCluskey, I said in Commit...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 769 c279 (Link to this contribution)

Is the noble Lord suggesting that we are all wasting our time?

Lord Empey | 769 cc279-280 (Link to this contribution)

Perish the thought of such an outrageous consideration, but I suspect that the Government will be...

Lord Lang of Monkton | 769 cc280-1 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I certainly agree with the noble Lord, Lord Empey, that there is a lot of imperviosity ...

Lord McAvoy | 769 cc281-2 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, for the removal of any doubt, I do not support any amendments in this group. But I am p...

Lord Keen of Elie | 769 cc282-4 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, perhaps I may begin with a material concession. When the noble Lord, Lord Empey, referr...

Lord McCluskey | 769 c284 (Link to this contribution)

Before the Minister moves on, may I ask just one question? In the earlier debate, I asked whether...

Lord Keen of Elie | 769 cc284-5 (Link to this contribution)

As I indicated, we are dealing with an entirely hypothetical situation. Should that situation eve...

Lord Hope of Craighead | 769 c285 (Link to this contribution)

Before the Minister sits down, I wonder whether he can help me on one point. I made it clear in C...

Lord Keen of Elie | 769 cc285-6 (Link to this contribution)

I am obliged to the noble and learned Lord, Lord Hope of Craighead. It determines clearly and una...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 769 c286 (Link to this contribution)

Will my noble and learned friend deal with the point about the people of Scotland, as opposed to ...

Lord Keen of Elie | 769 c286 (Link to this contribution)

I am obliged to my noble friend for reminding me of the question. As I said earlier, we are deali...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 769 c286 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I have come to the view that the noble Lord, Lord Empey, tactfully suggested—that we ar...

Lord Hope of Craighead | 769 c286 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Hope of Craighead

7: Clause 2, page 2, leave out lines 5 to 7 and inser...

Lord Hope of Craighead | 769 cc286-8 (Link to this contribution)

We return to Clause 2, and to a problem that cannot be dismissed as purely hypothetical. We are d...

Baroness Fookes | 769 c287 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, if Amendment 7 is agreed, I cannot call Amendments 8 to 12 inclusive by reason of pre-e...

Lord Cormack | 769 cc287-9 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I hope the occupant of the Woolsack will not to have to do that because I very much hop...

Lord McCluskey | 769 cc289-290 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I need not repeat the arguments that the noble Lord, Lord Cormack, has put forward agai...

Lord Stephen | 769 cc290-1 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I make it clear at the outset that we support the wording provided in his amendment by ...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 769 c292 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I would like to speak briefly to my Amendment 11, which would delete the words,

“...

Lord McCluskey | 769 c292 (Link to this contribution)

Has the noble Lord thought of suggesting to the Minister that perhaps he could take an informal w...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 769 cc292-3 (Link to this contribution)

Indeed, and there is another voice in support of the amendment tabled in the name of my noble fri...

Lord Norton of Louth | 769 cc293-5 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I have added my name to Amendment 7 in the name of the noble and learned Lord, Lord Hop...

Lord Thomas of Gresford | 769 c294 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I may be the only person present in the Chamber who was here when Lord Sewel issued the...

Lord Mackay of Clashfern | 769 cc294-6 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, some time ago I indicated to the noble and learned Lord, Lord McCluskey, that I support...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 769 c296 (Link to this contribution)

Does my noble and learned friend think that Amendment 7, which he says stretches the convention a...

Lord Mackay of Clashfern | 769 c296 (Link to this contribution)

What has become the convention now seems to be government papers. As far as I am concerned, I had...

Lord McCluskey | 769 c296 (Link to this contribution)

Do I understand the noble and learned Lord correctly that, without choosing between them, there a...

Lord Mackay of Clashfern | 769 cc296-7 (Link to this contribution)

I do not regard them as alternatives; rather that Amendment 12 tabled by the noble and learned Lo...

Lord Hope of Craighead | 769 c297 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, the problem with the term “Sewel convention” itself seems to beg a question as to exact...

Duke of Montrose | 769 c297 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I should say that if we get to the stage of putting this to a vote, I would like to sup...

Lord Empey | 769 cc297-8 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, can the Advocate-General tell us whether the use of the word “normally” is to allow the...

Lord Kerr of Kinlochard | 769 c298 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I will touch on a rather similar point to the one that the noble Lord, Lord Empey, just...

Lord McCluskey | 769 c298 (Link to this contribution)

Would the noble Lord support this possible solution? There is quite some time between now and Thi...

Lord Kerr of Kinlochard | 769 c299 (Link to this contribution)

I very much hope that the Government will give a serious, considered reply to the noble and learn...

Lord Davidson of Glen Clova | 769 c299 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, normally when the loyal Opposition hear valid and powerful arguments from many noble Lo...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 769 c299 (Link to this contribution)

I was puzzled by the noble and learned Lord’s assertion that he would be unable to support this b...

Lord Davidson of Glen Clova | 769 c299 (Link to this contribution)

I appreciate that the ornithological reference might necessarily be unhelpful to the party that I...

Lord Cormack | 769 c299 (Link to this contribution)

I am extremely grateful to the genial noble and learned Lord, but is he really saying that if thi...

Lord Davidson of Glen Clova | 769 c300 (Link to this contribution)

The noble Lord raises a matter that goes well beyond what I hoped we were going to be discussing....

Lord Davidson of Glen Clova | 769 c300 (Link to this contribution)

Oh, yes, he is. I hear observations that I am mischaracterising him, but no doubt the noble Lord,...

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 769 c300 (Link to this contribution)

The noble Lord is basically saying that, albeit various people, not least the noble Lord, Lord No...

Lord Davidson of Glen Clova | 769 cc300-1 (Link to this contribution)

The noble and learned Lord wants to know whether I am correct in identifying a political imperati...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 769 c301 (Link to this contribution)

I appreciate that we are on Report, but when the noble Lord describes this as an innovation which...

Lord Davidson of Glen Clova | 769 c301 (Link to this contribution)

I am slightly surprised that the noble Lord offers such support for this amendment. I will explai...

Lord Thomas of Gresford | 769 c301 (Link to this contribution)

I am attempting to follow the noble Lord down the tortuous passes of his philosophical musings, b...

Lord Davidson of Glen Clova | 769 cc301-2 (Link to this contribution)

There is a view, of course, that the Supreme Court is developing a constitutional role and that t...

Lord Tebbit | 769 c302 (Link to this contribution)

I am grateful to the noble and learned Lord. Will he just come to the point and meet the point th...

Lord Davidson of Glen Clova | 769 c302 (Link to this contribution)

The suggestion that I am waffling is one that I do not find wholly offensive.

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 769 c302 (Link to this contribution)

The noble and learned Lord asked whether he had dealt with all the issues. He has not dealt with ...

Lord Davidson of Glen Clova | 769 c302 (Link to this contribution)

I shall finish answering the noble Lord, Lord Tebbit, before I come to the interesting point made...

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 769 c303 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, to pick up the noble and learned Lord on that point, I think he is suggesting that a Pe...

Lord Davidson of Glen Clova | 769 c303 (Link to this contribution)

I feel that genies should not come out of their bottles; they should probably stay in their lamps...

Lord Stephen | 769 c303 (Link to this contribution)

The noble and learned Lord has made many points but I think he would accept that there is very wi...

Lord Davidson of Glen Clova | 769 c303 (Link to this contribution)

I consider that it has never been the role of the loyal Opposition to increase the wisdom of Memb...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 769 c303 (Link to this contribution)

Before the noble and learned Lord sits down, could it be that the political imperative is that he...

Lord Davidson of Glen Clova | 769 c303 (Link to this contribution)

Sorry, who is the Chief Whip in the other place? I am afraid it is not a man or woman I have ever...

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 769 c304 (Link to this contribution)

Perhaps I can help the noble and learned Lord because his Whips’ Office told my party’s Whips’ Of...

Lord Davidson of Glen Clova | 769 c304 (Link to this contribution)

As every Member of this House—every noble Lord, every noble Baroness—who has spent any time in th...

Viscount Younger of Leckie | 769 c304 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I believe that the House is ready to hear from the Minister.

Lord Keen of Elie | 769 c304 (Link to this contribution)

I can say that the Whip did not consult me on that proposition.

I am grateful for the detai...

769 c304 (Link to this contribution)

What about Lord Cormack?

Lord Keen of Elie | 769 cc304-6 (Link to this contribution)

I will come to that in a moment because normally I would come to “normally” when I am addressing ...

Lord Stephen | 769 c306 (Link to this contribution)

Does the Minister accept that since 1999 the practice has been that if there is a proposal to alt...

Lord Keen of Elie | 769 cc306-7 (Link to this contribution)

I cannot accept that because of the language employed. It was not the convention that dictated th...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 769 c307 (Link to this contribution)

I am listening very carefully to my noble and learned friend and basically he is saying that the ...

Lord Keen of Elie | 769 c307 (Link to this contribution)

I am obliged to my noble friend for his invitation. I refer to the recommendation of the Smith co...

Lord Keen of Elie | 769 c307 (Link to this contribution)

Given the noble Lord’s invitation to ignore it, it is more than a novelty; it is rather generous....

Lord Lester of Herne Hill | 769 c307 (Link to this contribution)

I had not intended to interrupt until I heard the noble and learned Lord just now. Since the doct...

Lord Keen of Elie | 769 c308 (Link to this contribution)

I am obliged to the noble Lord. I would suggest that it is a moot issue because there have been o...

Lord McCluskey | 769 c308 (Link to this contribution)

Then why does the Minister not simply accept Amendment 12, which says that,

“the decision a...

Lord Keen of Elie | 769 c308 (Link to this contribution)

I am obliged to the noble and learned Lord and I can express it only in these terms. It is the Go...

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 769 c308 (Link to this contribution)

The Minister says that the Government think that it is implicit in the clause. What is the proble...

Lord Keen of Elie | 769 c308 (Link to this contribution)

I note the observations of the noble and learned Lord, Lord Wallace, but I can observe only that ...

Lord Hope of Craighead | 769 cc308-310 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am extremely grateful to all those noble and learned and noble Lords who have support...

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 769 c310 (Link to this contribution)

Tabled by

Lord Wallace of Tankerness

13: Clause 2, page 2, line 7, at end insert—

...
Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 769 c310 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, with the same observation that the noble and learned Lord, Lord Hope of Craighead, made...

Earl of Dundee | 769 cc310-1 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

The Earl of Dundee

14: After Clause 2, insert the following new Clause—

<...
Earl of Dundee | 769 c311 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, this amendment would enable annual reports after the enactment of the Bill. These would...

Viscount Younger of Leckie | 769 c311 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, as we move on to this next amendment, I hope your Lordships will agree that it is appro...

Lord Foulkes of Cumnock | 769 c312 (Link to this contribution)

I thank the Minister for giving way. I am really glad that I was in when he said that, because I ...

Viscount Younger of Leckie | 769 c312 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, my clear understanding is that no undertaking was given whatever on that basis. We rema...

Lord Elton | 769 c312 (Link to this contribution)

Perhaps I could clarify the situation. As I understood it, when those remarks were made, we were ...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 769 c312 (Link to this contribution)

Further to that point, perhaps the noble Viscount could confirm that that is the position. To be ...

Viscount Younger of Leckie | 769 c312 (Link to this contribution)

My noble friend Lord Dunlop did indeed refer to discussions that might be taking places among the...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 769 c312 (Link to this contribution)

I did actually ask my noble friend to give us an assurance that, as far as Monday is concerned, t...

Viscount Younger of Leckie | 769 c312 (Link to this contribution)

I cannot as yet give an assurance on that. The rules on Report remain in place for today.

Lord Higgins | 769 c313 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, whether or not any undertaking has been given up to now, it is painfully obvious that w...

Lord Foulkes of Cumnock | 769 c313 (Link to this contribution)

This is duplicity by the Government, and it really needs to be sorted out. I have been sitting qu...

Lord Taylor of Holbeach | 769 c313 (Link to this contribution)

Will the noble Lord give way? I had hoped to be able to discuss this in an orderly fashion, and I...

Lord Higgins | 769 c313 (Link to this contribution)

I do not think my noble friend was in the Chamber when this discussion began. The issue was not w...

Lord Taylor of Holbeach | 769 c313 (Link to this contribution)

I am sorry: did I not make that clear? Although there will be no formal resolution to this effect...

Lord Foulkes of Cumnock | 769 c314 (Link to this contribution)

As the person who initially raised it, and as one of the usual troublemakers, I fully accept what...

Earl of Kinnoull | 769 cc314-5 (Link to this contribution)

That is very good news.

I thank the noble Earl, Lord Dundee, for allowing me to add my name...

Earl of Lindsay | 769 c315 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I support the amendment in the names of my noble friend the Earl of Dundee and the nobl...

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 769 cc315-6 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I shall speak briefly to support the spirit of the amendment in the names of the noble ...

Lord Norton of Louth | 769 c316 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I very much support the amendment introduced and moved so ably by my noble friend. It i...

Lord Lang of Monkton | 769 cc316-7 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I repeat briefly the support that I gave these proposals in Committee. The noble Earls,...

Lord McAvoy | 769 c317 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I, too, on behalf of the Labour Party, would like to record our support for the princip...

Lord Dunlop | 769 cc317-8 (Link to this contribution)

I am grateful to all noble Lords who have spoken, and in particular to my noble friend Lord Dunde...

Earl of Dundee | 769 c318 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am very grateful to all those who have contributed to this debate. To summarise, ther...

Lord Keen of Elie | 769 c319 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Keen of Elie

15: Clause 3, page 2, leave out lines 17 and 18 and insert...

Lord Keen of Elie | 769 cc319-320 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I shall first address Amendments 15 to 21. Under the Bill, and in line with the Smith c...

Lord Hope of Craighead | 769 c320 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I think I should thank the noble and learned Lord the Advocate-General for Scotland for...

Lord Mackay of Clashfern | 769 c320 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am glad that these amendments have been made. Of course, I understand that they will ...

Lord McFall of Alcluith | 769 c320 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, we agree with the Government on this very sensible measure. We appreciate the minor and...

Lord Keen of Elie | 769 c320 (Link to this contribution)

I am obliged to noble and learned Lords for their contributions.

Lord Keen of Elie | 769 c321 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Keen of Elie

16: Clause 3, page 3, leave out line 35 and insert—

...

Lord Dunlop | 769 c321 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Dunlop

17: Clause 5, page 5, line 27, leave out “from the words” and in...

Lord Dunlop | 769 c321 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Dunlop

19: Clause 10, page 11, line 29, at end insert “and (2C) (date o...

Lord Dunlop | 769 c321 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Dunlop

23: Clause 11, page 12, line 33, after “decided” insert “on”

...
Viscount Younger of Leckie | 769 c321 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I beg to move that further consideration on Report be now adjourned. In doing so, I sug...

Lord Newby | 769 c321 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, it would be to the benefit of the House in the conduct and progress of business if we m...

Viscount Younger of Leckie | 769 c322 (Link to this contribution)

I believe that it is right that we should adjourn the House, with the agreement of the House, unt...

Lord McFall of Alcluith | 769 c322 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I think we should just keep going since we are in the swing.

Viscount Younger of Leckie | 769 c322 (Link to this contribution)

With the agreement of the House, let us move on to the next amendment.

7.30 pm

Amendm...

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 769 c322 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Wallace of Tankerness

28: Clause 34, page 35, line 29, at end insert—

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 769 cc322-4 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am grateful to the House for allowing us to keep going. This amendment relates to the...

Lord MacKenzie of Culkein | 769 cc324-5 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I support much, though not all, of what the noble and learned Lord, Lord Wallace of Tan...

Earl of Kinnoull | 769 cc325-6 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am very grateful to the noble and learned Lord, Lord Wallace of Tankerness, for allow...

Earl of Kinnoull | 769 c326 (Link to this contribution)

—or sacredness between these two documents, and it seems that it is incumbent on the House to try...

Lord McFall of Alcluith | 769 cc326-7 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I endorse the comments of the noble and learned Lord, Lord Wallace, the noble Earl, Lor...

Lord Dunlop | 769 cc327-9 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I thank the noble and learned Lord, Lord Wallace, the noble Lords, Lord MacKenzie and L...

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 769 c329 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am grateful to all noble Lords who have taken part in this relatively short debate. I...

Legislation
Scotland Bill 2015-16
Back to top