UK Parliament / Open data

Education and Adoption Bill

Debate on bills on Monday, 8 February 2016, in the House of Lords, led by Lord Nash. The answering member was Lord Watson of Invergowrie.
Lords third reading debate. Agreed to on question. Bill passed and returned to the Commons with amendments.
Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
768 cc1989-2001 
Session
2015-16
Legislative stage
Third reading
Procedure
New clauses
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Education and Adoption Bill 2015-16. Brought from the Commons.
Wednesday, 16 September 2015
Bills
House of Lords
Education and Adoption Bill 2015-16. Lords amendments.
Monday, 8 February 2016
Bills
House of Commons
Proceeding contributions
Lord Nash | 768 c1989 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Nash

1: Clause 3, page 4, line 4, at end insert—

“(5) In section ...

Lord Nash | 768 cc1989-1990 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am delighted to be opening the Third Reading of the Education and Adoption Bill. I ta...


Show all contributions (21)
Lord Addington | 768 c1990 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Addington

2: After Clause 12, insert the following new Clause—

“R...

Lord Addington | 768 c1990 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, it became obvious during the progress of the Bill that the action proposed by Amendment...

Lord Watson of Invergowrie | 768 c1990 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Watson of Invergowrie

3: At end insert—

“(c) a guide for parents;...

Lord Watson of Invergowrie | 768 cc1991-2 (Link to this contribution)

Amendment 3 seeks to add two further requirements to the document on regional schools commissione...

Lord O'Shaughnessy | 768 c1992 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, as we are dealing with this issue of regional schools commissioners, I thought it might...

Lord Watson of Invergowrie | 768 c1992 (Link to this contribution)

Does the noble Lord know whether E-ACT consulted the regional schools commissioner before it deci...

Lord O'Shaughnessy | 768 c1993 (Link to this contribution)

I have no idea. I was referring to fact that schools of low quality were taken away from E-ACT.

Lord Nash | 768 cc1993-5 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I shall speak to Amendment 2, moved by the noble Lord, Lord Addington, and Amendment 3,...

Lord Watson of Invergowrie | 768 c1994 (Link to this contribution)

I certainly accept what the Minister is saying about parent forums, but why should that be to the...

Lord Nash | 768 cc1994-6 (Link to this contribution)

They can. They will have parents on their advisory boards and E-ACT is required, as are all multi...

Lord Watson of Invergowrie | 768 c1996 (Link to this contribution)

Perhaps I may follow that up. That is two parents in a multi-academy chain board. E-ACT has been ...

Lord Nash | 768 cc1996-7 (Link to this contribution)

That is why, as I understand it, they will have advisory bodies, which will consist of parents. A...

Lord Watson of Invergowrie | 768 cc1997-8 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I did not expect the Minister to make those remarks at this stage—I thought he would do...

Lord Addington | 768 c1998 (Link to this contribution)

If we may draw back from the amendments we are actually discussing, I thank the noble Lord for hi...

Lord Nash | 768 c1998 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Nash

4: Clause 14, page 9, line 41, leave out “1A” and insert “14”

<...
Lord Watson of Invergowrie | 768 cc1999-2000 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, we have now reached the point where this Bill must return to the other place. From thes...

Lord Storey | 768 cc2000-1 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I take the opportunity once again to thank the Minister for being prepared to listen. T...

Back to top