Does the Minister not agree that I gave some concrete and tangible examples where people might be justified in needing to have their claim backdated for longer than a month, through no fault of their own—for example, where forms have gone missing or where they have been sanctioned in error? Would it really mean any skin off the Government’s nose to include an element of flexibility to take account of those cases? If someone has lost a form or they have been sanctioned in error, those are not instances of behaviour that can be changed by limiting the backdating rules to one month.
Housing Benefit (Abolition of the Family Premium and Date of Claim Amendment) Regulations 2015
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Low of Dalston
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 3 February 2016.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Housing Benefit (Abolition of the Family Premium and Date of Claim Amendment) Regulations 2015.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
768 c1871 
Session
2015-16
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-07-02 17:17:33 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-02-03/16020380000035
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-02-03/16020380000035
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-02-03/16020380000035