UK Parliament / Open data

Housing Benefit (Abolition of the Family Premium and Date of Claim Amendment) Regulations 2015

Does the Minister not agree that I gave some concrete and tangible examples where people might be justified in needing to have their claim backdated for longer than a month, through no fault of their own—for example, where forms have gone missing or where they have been sanctioned in error? Would it really mean any skin off the Government’s nose to include an element of flexibility to take account of those cases? If someone has lost a form or they have been sanctioned in error, those are not instances of behaviour that can be changed by limiting the backdating rules to one month.

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
768 c1871 
Session
2015-16
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Back to top