My Lords, will the Leader agree with me that, for many years now, there has been dissatisfaction in all parts of the House with the binary choice that is open to us for either accepting or rejecting statutory instruments? Will she also agree that it is relevant that the procedure recommended by the noble Lord, Lord Strathclyde, is very similar to that which was recommended by the all-party royal commission under the noble Lord, Lord Wakeham, by the Leader’s Group in 2011 and by the Hansard Society and others? It would therefore be unfortunate if the circumstances in which this issue has arisen were to close people’s minds to positive consideration of the procedure that the noble Lord, Lord Strathclyde, has recommended.
House of Lords: Strathclyde Review
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Butler of Brockwell
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 17 December 2015.
It occurred during Ministerial statement on House of Lords: Strathclyde Review.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
767 c2196 
Session
2015-16
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2020-01-29 14:35:00 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-12-17/15121733000101
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-12-17/15121733000101
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-12-17/15121733000101