Could my noble friend explain the logic that says that Britain moves on modern slavery to set an example by enforcing it at home before we have international agreement, but refuses to move on this because there is to be a discussion about international agreement? Would it not be better for us just to move on it and set the example? That would help guide the discussions that might take place thereafter.
Bank of England and Financial Services Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Deben
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 11 November 2015.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Bank of England and Financial Services Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
765 c2077 
Session
2015-16
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2015-11-17 11:13:00 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-11-11/15111158000238
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-11-11/15111158000238
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-11-11/15111158000238