UK Parliament / Open data

Draft Investigatory Powers Bill

Ministerial statement on Wednesday, 4 November 2015, in the House of Lords, led by Lord Bates.
Lords statement on the draft Investigatory Powers Bill.
Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
765 cc1652-1666 
Session
2015-16
Department
Home Office
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
HM Government Transparency Report 2015: Disruptive and Investigatory Powers
Wednesday, 4 November 2015
Command papers
House of Lords
House of Commons
Draft Investigatory Powers Bill
Wednesday, 4 November 2015
Command papers
House of Lords
House of Commons
Deposited Paper DEP2016-0081
Tuesday, 8 December 2015
Deposited papers
House of Commons
Proceeding contributions
Lord Bates | 765 cc1652-5 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, with the leave of the House, I shall now repeat a Statement made by my right honourable...

Lord Rosser | 765 cc1653-8 (Link to this contribution)

I thank the Minister for repeating the Statement made in the Commons earlier today on the draft i...


Show all contributions (32)
Lord Paddick | 765 cc1658-9 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I, too, thank the Minister for repeating the Statement made by the Home Secretary in th...

Lord Bates | 765 cc1659-1660 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Rosser, for his broad welcome of this. He is right to poin...

Lord King of Bridgwater | 765 c1660 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I start on a rather personal note by saying to my noble friend how pleased I am—I think...

Lord Bates | 765 c1660 (Link to this contribution)

I am grateful to my noble friend. Of course, I recognise the work that he undertook, not only as ...

Lord Blair of Boughton | 765 c1661 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I echo the words of the noble Lord, Lord King, about the Minister. I am very glad that ...

Lord Bates | 765 c1661 (Link to this contribution)

The noble Lord is absolutely right, of course, and brings his wealth of experience to this area. ...

Lord Hutton of Furness | 765 c1661 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I think it is necessary that we take the new powers and I broadly welcome the additiona...

Lord Bates | 765 c1661 (Link to this contribution)

In many ways, we are starting from similar positions. The noble Lord believes that the people who...

Lord Blencathra | 765 c1662 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am grateful to my noble friend the Minister for his kind remarks about the Joint Comm...

Lord Bates | 765 c1662 (Link to this contribution)

The noble Lord is right, but that might not be necessary. I appreciate that the Bill has only jus...

Baroness Ludford | 765 c1662 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I, too, welcome the continuity and the expertise that the Minister brings, as well as h...

Lord Bates | 765 c1663 (Link to this contribution)

In terms of the judicial role, the judge will have sight of the same information as the Secretary...

Lord Tebbit | 765 c1663 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, perhaps I may remind my noble friend and the House that there are four parliamentarians...

Lord Bates | 765 c1663 (Link to this contribution)

My noble friend is absolutely right. We talk a lot about liberty and security but in order to enj...

Lord West of Spithead | 765 cc1663-4 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, although I agree with the noble Lord, Lord King, that is it is a delight to have the Mi...

Lord Bates | 765 c1664 (Link to this contribution)

The noble Lord is absolutely right. This is why it is important to work with communication servic...

Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb | 765 c1664 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, this has been described as a tidying-up Bill, and the reason for it is that the securit...

Lord Bates | 765 c1664 (Link to this contribution)

That is one of the reasons why we have put in place a much stronger, clearer and well-resourced i...

Lord Pannick | 765 cc1664-5 (Link to this contribution)

Can I press the Minister on what the Government intend by judicial authorisation? The Statement t...

Lord Bates | 765 c1665 (Link to this contribution)

We have stated that there is a double lock, and it is just that. Without both the judge and the S...

Lord Campbell-Savours | 765 c1665 (Link to this contribution)

If the judge, in the explanation just given by the Minister, can effectively veto the Secretary o...

Lord Bates | 765 c1665 (Link to this contribution)

Accountability lies in that it was the Secretary of State, first, who made the decision and that ...

Lord Strasburger | 765 c1665 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, shortly after being introduced to this House I had the temerity to start raising concer...

Lord Strasburger | 765 c1665 (Link to this contribution)

It will come. I am gratified to see that all parts of the House now recognise that the current la...

Lord Strasburger | 765 c1665 (Link to this contribution)

I shall save my questions for the Select Committee, but in the mean time I shall ask just one. Wh...

Lord Bates | 765 c1665 (Link to this contribution)

The Joint Committee is in the process of being formed, through the usual channels. It is hoped th...

Lord Young of Norwood Green | 765 c1666 (Link to this contribution)

We talked about trust and getting the balance right in the Bill, but it works both ways. Yes, of ...

Lord Bates | 765 c1666 (Link to this contribution)

I totally agree—that is why the police have put out such a thorough operational case for this. It...

Back to top