UK Parliament / Open data

Advertising of Prostitution (Prohibition) Bill [HL]

Debate on bills on Friday, 23 October 2015, in the House of Lords, led by Lord McColl of Dulwich. The answering member was Lord Bates.
Lords second reading. Agreed to on question. Bill committed to a Committee of the Whole House.
Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
765 cc945-964 
Session
2015-16
Department
Home Office
Legislative stage
Second reading
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Advertising of Prostitution (Prohibition) Bill (HL) 2015-16
Tuesday, 2 June 2015
Bills
House of Lords
Proceeding contributions
Lord McColl of Dulwich | 765 cc946-9 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, as noble Lords will know, I have previously introduced a Private Member’s Bill to addre...

Baroness Butler-Sloss | 765 cc949-950 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I congratulate the noble Lord, Lord McColl, not only on the Bill but on the enormous am...


Show all contributions (21)
Bishop of Derby | 765 cc950-2 (Link to this contribution)

I too congratulate the noble Lord, Lord McColl, and thank him for introducing the Bill and for hi...

Lord Davies of Stamford | 765 cc952-4 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I start by saying that I totally share the horror of the noble Lord, Lord McColl, and t...

Lord McColl of Dulwich | 765 c954 (Link to this contribution)

Before the noble Lord sits down, could it be by some unimaginable stretch of the imagination that...

Lord Davies of Stamford | 765 c954 (Link to this contribution)

The noble Lord’s Bill, as I have just said, talks about advertising—but, as I have also said, it ...

Lord McColl of Dulwich | 765 c954 (Link to this contribution)

The noble Lord reminds me very much of part of the Queen’s speech—I refer to the Queen’s speech i...

Lord Davies of Stamford | 765 c954 (Link to this contribution)

The noble Lord has brought forward a Bill which is a bit of a false prospectus. If he had talked ...

Lord Davies of Stamford | 765 c954 (Link to this contribution)

I shall give way in just one second, after I finish my sentence. The noble Lord has brought forwa...

Baroness Butler-Sloss | 765 c954 (Link to this contribution)

Before the noble Lord sits down, perhaps I may calm this a little. I have absolutely no intention...

Lord Davies of Stamford | 765 c955 (Link to this contribution)

When I read the Bill, I thought that it was slightly curious because, for the reasons I have just...

Baroness Gale | 765 cc955-6 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord McColl, for introducing this important Bill, which I fully...

Lord Morrow | 765 cc956-8 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I support the Bill proposed by the noble Lord, Lord McColl. I believe that addressing t...

Lord Kennedy of Southwark | 765 cc958-9 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, first, like other noble Lords, I congratulate the noble Lord, Lord McColl of Dulwich, o...

Lord Bates | 765 cc959-962 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I join all other noble Lords in paying tribute to my noble friend Lord McColl. As someo...

Lord Kennedy of Southwark | 765 c962 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, the noble Lord made a point about the practicalities and that is the point I made gener...

Lord Bates | 765 c963 (Link to this contribution)

That is a fair point. It is for the usual channels and my noble friend Lord Gardiner, the Deputy ...

Lord McColl of Dulwich | 765 c963 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I thank all those who have taken part in this debate and the Minister for his kind rema...

Lord Davies of Stamford | 765 cc963-4 (Link to this contribution)

I was guided in my remarks by the phrase in the first line of the noble Lord’s substantive Bill:<...

Lord McColl of Dulwich | 765 c964 (Link to this contribution)

I shall certainly take legal advice about that and see whether we can tighten things up later on....

Back to top