UK Parliament / Open data

Police Federation (Amendment) Regulations 2015

Debates on delegated legislation on Wednesday, 15 July 2015, in the House of Lords, led by Baroness Harris of Richmond. The answering member was Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon.
Lords motion to regret that the Police Federation (Amendment) Regulations 2015 prevent the federation from being properly funded in order to represent its members (SI 2015/630). Motion debated and withdrawn.
Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
764 cc667-682 
Session
2015-16
Department
Home Office
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Police Federation (Amendment) Regulations
Thursday, 12 March 2015
Statutory instruments
House of Lords
House of Commons
Proceeding contributions
Baroness Harris of Richmond | 764 cc667-9 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I remind your Lordships of my registered interests and, particularly, that I chair the ...

Lord Mackenzie of Framwellgate | 764 c670 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I rise in support of the Motion moved by the noble Baroness, Lady Harris. I declare an ...


Show all contributions (18)
Baroness Young of Hornsey | 764 cc670-2 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I remind your Lordships of my registered interest as a member of the interim independen...

Lord Rosser | 764 cc673-5 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I begin by declaring that I am a member of the police service parliamentary scheme comm...

Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon | 764 cc675-7 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Harris, for tabling this debate. At this late hour, I ...

Lord Rosser | 764 c677 (Link to this contribution)

Does the Minister intend to go on to tell us what those limited entitlements are? Are they the sa...

Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon | 764 cc677-8 (Link to this contribution)

I will come to some of the specific points the noble Lord has raised. On the exact entitlements, ...

Lord Rosser | 764 c678 (Link to this contribution)

How will the federation know who all the new officers are? Will it be told by chief constables, o...

Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon | 764 c678 (Link to this contribution)

The onus is on the federation. As I said earlier, it is for the federation to make the case for n...

Lord Rosser | 764 c678 (Link to this contribution)

What the Minister is saying—and I am just trying to get this clear—is that the federation will ha...

Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon | 764 c679 (Link to this contribution)

I think that the noble Lord is putting words into my mouth. I did not say that—I said that it was...

Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon | 764 c679 (Link to this contribution)

Perhaps I can make my point; I have listened to the points that he has made. Every police force l...

Lord Rosser | 764 c679 (Link to this contribution)

I think that the noble Lord has answered the question. If he had answered it before and I had not...

Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon | 764 cc679-680 (Link to this contribution)

Perhaps the reason why there was some confusion on my part is that that is how it works now. Ther...

Lord Mackenzie of Framwellgate | 764 c680 (Link to this contribution)

Before Minister sits down, will he confirm that similar provisions do not apply to the Police Sup...

Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon | 764 c680 (Link to this contribution)

I am sure that the noble Lord is well versed in what he has just quoted. In terms of confirming w...

Baroness Harris of Richmond | 764 cc680-2 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister. He will not be surprised to hear that I am not at all sa...

Back to top