My Lords, not having worked in local government but having sat on boards that involved public money, such as that of the Royal Opera House, I very much like to see open debate. On the other hand, I think the point that the noble Lord, Lord Heseltine, made is very pertinent. Sometimes, if people cannot think outside the box, as we had to when the Royal Opera House was faced with closure, what tends to happen is that the things that the proponents of this amendment want can be completely thwarted: discussion can become more closed because people are frightened of saying what needs to be said, as it will create such a storm. I am not going to come down either way on this but I see both points. As somebody who has sat on a board and wrestled with this, I reiterate that I understand the point that the noble Lord, Lord Heseltine, made.
Cities and Local Government Devolution Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Berkeley of Knighton
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 13 July 2015.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Cities and Local Government Devolution Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
764 c399 
Session
2015-16
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2017-01-19 10:28:49 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-07-13/1507138000056
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-07-13/1507138000056
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-07-13/1507138000056