I am again grateful to the noble Lord, and this, I promise your Lordships, will be my last intervention, but with all due respect he cannot represent my argument and I do not believe that he ever could. Audits are there to look at something through a particular lens. The economic arguments that we have heard have been dressed up as an exact science. If that is so, I would be interested to hear why economists and certain Treasuries have got it wrong for so long. At the heart of the debate is making sure that commitments that we have made globally are met and that we imagine that we are the poorest, not that we sit in this noble House and go home and afford ourselves the services that we do. I will not intervene again but, with all due respect to the noble Lord, he does not and could not make my arguments.
International Development (Official Development Assistance Target) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Cashman
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Friday, 6 February 2015.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on International Development (Official Development Assistance Target) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
759 c925 
Session
2014-15
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-11 18:28:26 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-02-06/15020642000206
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-02-06/15020642000206
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-02-06/15020642000206