The noble Baroness has an aversion to the Treasury—I cannot imagine why—but the Treasury has this power to provide the guidance under the Bill. The Treasury and the FCA have set out the details of what the guidance has to contain. It is already written into the FCA rulebook that it has to cover benefits. Therefore, the Government’s contention is that there is no need for a second amendment requiring this to be in the Bill when not only will it happen, but the rules saying that the guidance providers must do it are already in existence.
Pension Schemes Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Newby
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 5 February 2015.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Pension Schemes Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
759 c794 
Session
2014-15
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2017-03-22 11:21:27 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-02-05/15020555000115
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-02-05/15020555000115
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-02-05/15020555000115