I do not accept it in the way that the noble Lord has formulated it. I say that there should be two doctors who have properly, on good evidence, considered the case. It may well be that neither of those doctors has been engaged in the long-term or even short-term care of the person. But I would be satisfied with the gateway involving two doctors who have gone through a proper and rigorous process, and I disagree with the noble Lord when he says that they have to have known the person for six months. Indeed, I do not think he is even saying that because registration over a six-month period would not necessarily involve any contact whatever with the general practitioner.
Assisted Dying Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Falconer of Thoroton
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Friday, 16 January 2015.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Assisted Dying Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
758 c1059 
Session
2014-15
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2015-05-22 09:19:42 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-01-16/15011659000313
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-01-16/15011659000313
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-01-16/15011659000313