I thank the Minister for that response. I was with him when he started because I thought he said that what is in our amendment already happens, in which case I would have been very pleased to withdraw it. However, as he went on he began to say that, although this was something that was within the chief inspector’s potential functions, it was not something that was required. I would be grateful if he would clarify what exactly, at the current time, the chief inspector’s responsibilities are. I am not going to argue about whether we have put the amendment in the right place—we may well have put it in the wrong place—but is it part of his current functions to advise on the quality and appropriateness of the facilities and premises used by registered providers? If it is, I will be happy to withdraw the amendment.
Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Jones of Whitchurch
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 14 January 2015.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
758 c221GC 
Session
2014-15
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2021-10-12 15:31:25 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-01-14/15011469000090
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-01-14/15011469000090
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-01-14/15011469000090