My Lords, I agree with the noble Lord that the amendments are very technical at one level. However, they are not technical amendments; they are proper substantive amendments. They broaden the scope of the type of pension where people will be required to take advice. I will happily write to him if I can provide him with more details. I think that it simply became apparent to officials during the Bill’s passage that this was a potential—relatively small—market involving a type of pension lump sum that had not been covered in the way that had always been intended for this sort of thing. As we find with most Bills as they go through the House, the Government introduce amendments because they become apparent to officials as they do more work and to parliamentary counsel as it does more work. If there was anything more specific that led to these amendments, I will definitely write to him.
Pension Schemes Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Newby
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 12 January 2015.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Pension Schemes Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
758 c610 
Session
2014-15
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2015-05-22 08:56:38 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-01-12/15011240000085
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-01-12/15011240000085
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-01-12/15011240000085