Perhaps I may finish answering this question before I answer the next one. The hypothetically negligent accountant—if he or she has made a negligent error—is going to be liable. This is not going to add anything to that position. It would be no good for them to say, “In the 99 other years in which I did this particular act, I did a good job”, because that just would not bite on this. It does not seem to me that it is very likely that, on the particular hypothesis that the noble and learned Lord put forward, it would have any application.
Social Action, Responsibility and Heroism Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Faulks
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 15 December 2014.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Social Action, Responsibility and Heroism Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
758 c38 
Session
2014-15
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2015-05-22 08:14:34 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2014-12-15/14121519000183
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2014-12-15/14121519000183
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2014-12-15/14121519000183