I, too, support the amendment from the noble Lord, Lord Pannick. I sympathise with the amendment from the noble Lord, Lord Aberdare, but the whole point of the law of negligence is that it is for a claimant to establish that the defendant did not act reasonably. Some of the cases cited by the noble Lord would be very unlikely indeed to attract any award of damages against somebody acting reasonably in an emergency situation to help somebody with unfortunate consequences. I cannot see that any such claim would succeed but he is right to differ slightly from the amendment tabled by the noble Earl, Lord Attlee. However, the best formulation is that put forward by the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, and I hope the Minister will accept it.
Social Action, Responsibility and Heroism Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Beecham
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 18 November 2014.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Social Action, Responsibility and Heroism Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
757 c419 
Session
2014-15
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2015-05-22 06:29:31 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2014-11-18/14111863000078
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2014-11-18/14111863000078
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2014-11-18/14111863000078