UK Parliament / Open data

Infrastructure Bill [HL]

Proceeding contribution from Lord Bradshaw (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 3 November 2014. It occurred during Debate on bills on Infrastructure Bill [HL].

My Lords, I ask the Minister to consider what will happen if the bids received under the franchise competition actually give less money—or are worth less to the taxpayer—than the present east coast trains. If the bids are lower than that being achieved by the present operator, that really does sound like the economics of the madhouse. Those who are bidding have the sword of Damocles hanging over them, because open access operators are allowed access to the track at a much lower price than the franchised operator. It appears that the open access operators are massing for an attack on the east coast line.

Lastly, I recommend to the Minister an article in Passenger Transport, a rather specialist magazine. There is a good two-page article about customer service and its effect on staff morale and how the present franchising system does not allow operators to go strong on customer service. If they do so, they risk losing the next bid because customer service, among other things, cannot be put into a financial evaluation.

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
756 c1446 
Session
2014-15
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Back to top