UK Parliament / Open data

Electricity Capacity Regulations 2014

Debates on delegated legislation on Thursday, 24 July 2014, in the House of Lords, led by Baroness Verma. The answering member was Viscount Hanworth.
Lords motion to consider. Agreed to on question.
Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
755 cc509-538GC 
Session
2014-15
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Statutory Instruments Joint Committee fourth report.
Wednesday, 2 July 2014
Parliamentary committees
House of Lords
House of Commons
Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee sixth report.
Tuesday, 15 July 2014
Parliamentary committees
House of Lords
Electricity Market Reform (General) Regulations 2014
Thursday, 24 July 2014
Parliamentary proceedings
House of Lords
Contracts for Difference (Allocation) Regulations 2014
Thursday, 24 July 2014
Parliamentary proceedings
House of Lords

Show all related items (8)
Contracts for Difference (Electricity Supplier Obligations) Regulations 2014
Thursday, 24 July 2014
Parliamentary proceedings
House of Lords
Contracts for Difference (Definition of Eligible Generator) Regulations 2014
Thursday, 24 July 2014
Parliamentary proceedings
House of Lords
Contracts for Difference (Standard Terms) Regulations 2014
Thursday, 24 July 2014
Parliamentary proceedings
House of Lords
Electricity Capacity Regulations 2014
Monday, 28 July 2014
Parliamentary proceedings
House of Lords
Proceeding contributions
Baroness Verma | 755 cc509-515GC (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, today we are considering the six instruments which form the implementing secondary legi...

Baroness Worthington | 755 c515GC (Link to this contribution)

Can the Minister clarify something for me? There are seven instruments listed on the Order Paper,...


Show all contributions (16)
Baroness Verma | 755 c515GC (Link to this contribution)

That one will be debated separately.

Lord Jenkin of Roding | 755 cc515-520GC (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, my noble friend the Minister has made a very brave and thorough attempt to explain all ...

Viscount Hanworth | 755 cc519-521GC (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I wish to reassert and reinforce some of the anxieties that we have been listening to. ...

Lord Deben | 755 cc521-3GC (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I, too, support my noble friend in his concerns. It is a pity that the noble Viscount, ...

Lord Whitty | 755 cc523-6GC (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, as the noble Lord said, we knew that this was a massive task for the Government and tha...

Lord Oxburgh | 755 cc526-7GC (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, many of the points that I would have made have already been made by other speakers more...

Baroness Worthington | 755 cc527-533GC (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Baroness for her comments by way of introduction and for tak...

Baroness Verma | 755 cc528-534GC (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords for their helpful remarks and questions. It has been a well-inf...

Lord Jenkin of Roding | 755 c534GC (Link to this contribution)

I am grateful to my noble friend for that. She reiterated the statement made this morning by her ...

Baroness Verma | 755 cc534-6GC (Link to this contribution)

I am extremely grateful to my noble friend for that clarification. I hope that I will be able to ...

Baroness Worthington | 755 c536GC (Link to this contribution)

On a point of clarification, I did not ask whether CCS was eligible; I stated that I knew that it...

Baroness Verma | 755 cc536-7GC (Link to this contribution)

In direct response to the noble Lord, Lord Oxburgh, who did ask that, I think that I have laid th...

Baroness Worthington | 755 c537GC (Link to this contribution)

Some of my questions have perhaps been a bit lost in translation. One of my questions on coal was...

Baroness Verma | 755 cc537-8GC (Link to this contribution)

I am grateful to the noble Baroness but I do not think that it got lost in translation. I respond...

Back to top