Perhaps I may add a question so that my noble friend can answer them all in one fell swoop. Strangely enough, although I agree with the five-year initial term, it not clear, as the noble Lord, Lord Stevenson, pointed out, whether a subsequent authorisation can be longer than five years. The noble Lord, Lord Howarth, might be entirely delirious with a 20-year extension. I would not be very keen on that but he might think that it was a wonderful thing. But from my reading of the regulations, it is not clear whether or not that subsequent authorisation could be longer than the initial authorisation.
Copyright and Rights in Performances (Extended Collective Licensing) Regulations 2014
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Clement-Jones
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 21 July 2014.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Copyright and Rights in Performances (Extended Collective Licensing) Regulations 2014.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
755 c332GC 
Session
2014-15
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2014-10-09 11:59:54 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2014-07-21/1407219000070
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2014-07-21/1407219000070
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2014-07-21/1407219000070