Will the noble Baroness deal with the point that a distinction can be made between the period of authorisation of a collecting society to go about its business—there may well be a very reasonable case to limit that to five years and then look and see whether its performance has been good and it should be allowed to continue, on the one hand—and a licence that is given, for example, to a library to undertake mass digitisation? It does not follow from the need to be sure that the collecting society is doing a proper job, in general, that you have to restrict the licence that it approves to a period of five years. In fact, it can be extended beyond five years, to 10 years perhaps, or further. Can she deal with that, please?
Copyright and Rights in Performances (Extended Collective Licensing) Regulations 2014
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Howarth of Newport
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 21 July 2014.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Copyright and Rights in Performances (Extended Collective Licensing) Regulations 2014.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
755 c330GC 
Session
2014-15
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2014-10-09 11:59:54 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2014-07-21/1407219000057
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2014-07-21/1407219000057
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2014-07-21/1407219000057