My Lords, I came with an open mind to this debate and I am afraid I have to say to the Minister, for whom I have great respect, that I am now minded to support this amendment. The reason for that, quite simply, is that the overriding priority for all of us must be the reassurance of the public, whose security lies at the heart of this whole debate, and the public are suspicious of the motives of those in power, as my noble friend Lady Kennedy has just outlined. The later the date, the more suspicious they become, so there have to be compelling reasons for this longer period. We are not talking about doing this in three weeks; we are talking about 18 months and I have not heard anything by way of a month-by-month account of why this extra time is needed. So unless the Minister can say something to provide detailed, compelling arguments for this extra time being necessary, I am minded to support the amendment.
Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Wills
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 17 July 2014.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
755 c733 
Session
2014-15
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2014-07-26 21:16:51 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2014-07-17/14071753000230
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2014-07-17/14071753000230
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2014-07-17/14071753000230