My Lords, I rise to support this amendment. I believe that the noble Lord, Lord Whitty, has underestimated the effect of the change to the primary duties of Ofgem in the 2008 Act, which states that the duties for present and future customers are one of the underlying bases of its commitment to sustainability. The problem that it faces is that the limitations of the sustainable action that should be undertaken have not yet been tested. I had the fun of suggesting to Ofwat that we could take it to judicial review to suggest that it was not fulfilling this pledge. That had an enormous effect on Ofgem. Ofgem should be commended for the strides that have been taken over the past six years to move from an organisation that saw sustainability as something outside its remit to seeing it as something that is very much part of its remit. The value of this—an amendment first moved by the noble Lord, Lord Oxburgh, to which I added my name—is such that it has changed the culture of Ofgem. It is rather unfortunate that Ofwat does not have the same duty and therefore the same drive to understand that it has that responsibility.
Water Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Redesdale
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 6 February 2014.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Water Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
752 c268 
Session
2013-14
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2014-02-10 11:53:42 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2014-02-06/14020661000067
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2014-02-06/14020661000067
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2014-02-06/14020661000067