UK Parliament / Open data

Care Bill [HL]

Proceeding contribution from Lord MacKenzie of Culkein (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 21 October 2013. It occurred during Debate on bills on Care Bill [HL].

My Lords, I also support both amendments. It seems to me, as a nurse, to be a self-evident proposition that having safe staffing

levels and the correct skill mix, taking into account dependency and acuity, is the right thing do. Anyone who has listened to the debates in this House on various Bills dealing with health and social care over the past few months knows that it is an enormously complicated issue. However, we must bring it back to this level of patient safety and the duty of providers to provide safe staffing levels and the correct skill mix. If that is not done, all the other things we talk about will be in vain and we will end up with more reports, more inquiries and more problems.

As has already been said, it is incumbent on Governments to take account of all these things: the Francis report, the review into Winterbourne View and some of the recommendations in the excellent report produced a few months ago by the noble Lord, Lord Willis. It is vital that we get this right. At a time when financial pressures will force authorities to look at diluting the numbers of trained nursing staff and trained staff in the community and replacing them with healthcare assistants or support workers with hugely varied levels of training and experience, it is absolutely right that we get the correct level. As has already been said, both of these amendments can only add to the Bill and take nothing away from it.

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
748 cc826-7 
Session
2013-14
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Back to top