Local Audit and Accountability Bill [HL]
Wednesday, 26 June 2013
Bills
House of Lords
Moved by
Lord McKenzie of Luton
1*: Clause 1, page 1, line 10, at end insert “in part...
My Lords, in moving the amendment, I will speak to the other amendments in this group as well. As...
Show all contributions (104)
My Lords, in Committee, my noble friend said that the Government would commit to amend the legisl...
My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord McKenzie, for introducing the amendments so succinctly and...
My Lords, I thank the Minister for her reply and the noble Lord, Lord Palmer, for his contributio...
My Lords, I want to make it clear that it is the Government’s intention to see that the proposed ...
My Lords, again, I thank the Minister for that. Indeed, I was tempted to press this amendment but...
Moved by
Lord McKenzie of Luton
2*: Clause 1, page 2, line 4, at end insert—
“(...
My Lords, I will speak also to Amendment 3. The more we delve into this Bill, the clearer it beco...
My Lords, the purpose of Amendments 2 and 6 is clearly to try to improve the transitional arrange...
My Lords, I thank my noble friend Lord Palmer for bringing some rationality into this particular ...
My Lords, before the noble Baroness sits down, will she kindly explain a point on which I am very...
My Lords, the current contracts are due to last until 2017, and there will then be an interim arr...
Again, I am grateful to the Minister for her response and to the noble Lord, Lord Palmer, for his...
My Lords, I may need to write to the noble Lord on the detail of this. However, our understanding...
I am grateful to the Minister for that but perhaps it is time we stretched our legs. I beg leave ...
Moved by
Lord McKenzie of Luton
4: Clause 2, page 2, line 26, at end insert—
“(...
My Lords, this is a rerun of the amendment we moved in Committee concerning hybridity. It was pro...
My Lords, from these Benches we also look forward to the Minister giving that information. Althou...
My Lords, as the noble Lord said, I was sympathetic about his amendment in Committee. It would en...
I am grateful to the Minister for that commitment which is very clear. I would still prefer to se...
Moved by
Lord McKenzie of Luton
5: Clause 4, page 3, line 26, leave out “by that auth...
This is a return, briefly I expect, to a drafting point. Under Clause 4 there is a requirement th...
My Lords, I would also welcome the Minister clarifying some issues, particularly if there is, ind...
My Lords, first, I confirm that it is possible to introduce different parts of the Bill at differ...
I missed the Minister’s first point. Would she mind repeating the beginning of that sentence?
...It is our intention to make arrangements to enable us to do this under the powers in the Bill. Ou...
I thank the Minister for her reply and the noble Lord, Lord Palmer, for his contribution. I say t...
Before the noble Lord, Lord McKenzie, sits down, I will just comment on the point about the appoi...
My Lords, the noble Lord makes an interesting point but my understanding is that the contracts fo...
My Lords, before calling Amendment 6, I should point out that there is a mistake on the Marshalle...
Moved by
Baroness Hanham
7: Clause 7, page 6, line 7, after “jointly” insert “in rela...
My Lords, in moving Amendment 7, I will also speak to Amendment 8, which between them make small ...
My Lords, obviously we are content with these amendments, and I thank the noble Baroness for taki...
Moved by
Baroness Hanham
8: Clause 7, page 6, line 8, leave out “accounts, or” and in...
Moved by
Lord McKenzie of Luton
10: Schedule 4, page 41, line 3, at end insert—
My Lords, the purpose of the amendment is to test the scope of the term “independence”, although ...
My Lords, the amendment of the noble Lords, Lord McKenzie and Lord Beecham, says that an individu...
My Lords, my noble friend and the noble Lord, Lord McKenzie, raised several issues, seeking clari...
Can the Minister give a bit more information about the process of selection for independence? Tha...
My Lords, local authorities have due process already, as the noble Baroness knows, on how to appo...
I thank the Minister for her reply. The noble Lord, Lord Palmer, criticised the drafting of the a...
Although I do not think that I mentioned sub-committees, I think that I made it clear that where ...
My Lords, I am grateful for that and beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Moved by
Baroness Hanham
11: Schedule 5, page 50, line 8, leave out “and” and insert—...
My Lords, Amendment 11 is necessary following a recent amendment to the Companies Act 2006 made b...
My Lords, we are perfectly happy with this amendment.
Moved by
Lord Wallace of Saltaire
12: Clause 19, page 13, line 9, after “accounts,” i...
My Lords, this group of amendments deals with amending the scope of the auditors’ work. Amendment...
My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Wallace, for introducing these amendments. We are happy wi...
My Lords, on Amendment 12, if the statement is true, are not the words “fair view” fatuous? Could...
My Lords, unfortunately in accountancy there is a certain jargon. “True and fair view” is jargon ...
Does not the noble Lord think that a legislature is entitled not purely to accept jargon, however...
My Lords, my attempts to help in this House usually end up in worse confusion, but let me try. I ...
My Lords, I have been sitting reflecting on the Psalms which are read to us in that wonderful tra...
Moved by
Lord Wallace of Saltaire
13: Clause 20, page 13, line 37, leave out “health ...
Moved by
Lord Wills
18: After Clause 22, insert the following new Clause—
“Audi...
My Lords, both amendments aim to improve transparency in the new arrangements for local governmen...
My Lords, I remind the House of my vice-presidency of the Local Government Association. I was una...
My Lords, this is a very interesting amendment. I just wanted to add one other perspective. Any l...
My Lords, I have some knowledge of procurement issues. I, too, declare my interest as a vice-pres...
My Lords, we are sympathetic to my noble friend’s amendments and supportive of the intention behi...
My Lords, this has been quite a wide-ranging debate and I recognise the importance of the issue t...
My Lords, I am grateful to everyone who has contributed to what has been a valuable debate and fr...
Moved by
Lord Wallace of Saltaire
19: Schedule 7, page 60, line 13, leave out “before...
My Lords, this amendment makes a small change to paragraph 1 of Schedule 7. It slightly changes t...
My Lords, we have Amendment 20 in this group. Obviously, we support the government amendment beca...
Moved by
Lord McKenzie of Luton
22: Schedule 9, page 74, line 1, at end insert—
My Lords, this, too, is a re-run of the amendment moved in Committee, which we consider is unreso...
My Lords, I begin by informing the House that, following careful consideration of all options, th...
My Lords, I must express some disappointment with the Minister’s response. I am grateful for the ...
The Cabinet Office is looking at the issue of fraud and error in government as a whole in a wider...
I am grateful for that further explanation. I take the point that this will not just be left lyin...
I note the noble Lord’s preference for belt and braces. I have some doubts about how many pieces ...
I am grateful for that. I recognise that the Minister sees this as extremely poor, as, indeed, do...
Moved by
Baroness Hanham
24: Clause 38, page 23, line 37, leave out “a local authorit...
My Lords, in June, the Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee published its report on t...
My Lords, we are now coming to that part of the Bill that reflects several of the obsessions of t...
My Lords, as the noble Lord knows, on the code of conduct, as regards publicity, and in general, ...
Moved by
Lord Tope
25: Clause 38, page 23, leave out line 38 and insert “where the Se...
My Lords, I shall also speak to Amendments 28, 30, 33, 35, 36 and 37. Before doing so, I must, fo...
My Lords, I willingly gave my name to the amendments in this group. Like the noble Lord, Lord Top...
My Lords, as I listened to the noble Lord, Lord Tope, moving his amendment—which, given an opport...
My Lords, I am probably in danger of saying the same thing three times as there is no doubt that ...
My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Earl, Lord Lytton, for clearly supporting my amendments and ...
Moved by
Baroness Hanham
26: Clause 38, page 23, line 38, at end insert “or those aut...
Moved by
Baroness Hanham
29: Clause 38, page 24, line 11, leave out from “a” to end o...
Moved by
Baroness Hanham
31: Clause 38, page 24, line 20, leave out from “it” to end ...
Moved by
Baroness Hanham
34: Clause 38, page 24, line 30, leave out from “section” to...
Moved by
Baroness Hanham
38: Clause 38, page 24, line 44, at end insert—
“4B Po...
Moved by
Lord Beecham
40: Clause 38, page 24, line 46, at end insert—
“(3) In s...
My Lords, this amendment stems from concerns raised at a meeting of the all-party group inquiry i...
I am happy to confirm what I have written to the noble Lord and I will read it out. The publicity...
Indeed, I am, and I repeat my thanks to the Minister for making the position clear. Now it is on ...
Moved by
Lord Beecham
41: Clause 38, leave out Clause 38
My Lords, in the parallel universe occupied by the Secretary of State, Pulitzer prize-style munic...
My Lords, the trouble with clause stand part debates is that they tend to come after everything e...
I thank the Minister for her reply, of course, but I simply do not recognise the world she descri...
Moved by
Lord Beecham
42: Clause 39, page 26, line 14, leave out subsection (15)
My Lords, this amendment refers to the Government’s proposal—which, again, was not subjected to s...
My Lords, I speak in support of Amendment 43, and will be brief. I agree with the noble Lord, Lor...
My Lords, since my name is to Amendment 43, I would like to voice my support for the point that h...
My Lords, Amendments 42 and 43 would remove subsections (15) and (16) from Clause 39. Amendment 4...
My Lords, it comes to this, it seems to me: you have a system which takes no account of levies, y...