My Lords, I was not planning to speak on the amendment but the noble Lord, Lord Young, made such a good fist of the arguments that I wanted to say that this matter needs serious examination. In fact, when one looks closely, one sees that this is a relatively mild amendment because it does not really constitute exemplary damages. It simply rolls up royalties into a lump sum that otherwise could have been awarded by a court. Exemplary damages are rather tougher. Indeed, many rights holders complain that the provisions of the amendment would be inadequate when all they are going to get is just the equivalent of a royalty when, in fact, an infringement has taken place over a long period. One could go a lot further, but as a first step and as a way of stimulating discussion this is an interesting amendment.
Intellectual Property Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Clement-Jones
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 18 June 2013.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Intellectual Property Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
746 c80GC 
Session
2013-14
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2015-03-26 19:30:28 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-06-18/130618132000101
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-06-18/130618132000101
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-06-18/130618132000101