The most reverend Primate referred to divorce and annulment. We are not changing the definition of “annulment” because it is an historical definition that is linked to procreation. As I said at Second Reading and again today, clearly there is a distinction between same-sex couples and opposite-sex couples because procreation is not available to same-sex couples. We are not seeking to change the definition of existing marriage law and how it applies to opposite-sex couples. We think it is perfectly proper for that distinction to remain as it is and not be changed in order to apply to same-sex couples, because that would render it meaningless.
Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Stowell of Beeston
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 17 June 2013.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL), Debate on bills and Committee proceeding on Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
746 c52 
Session
2013-14
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2014-03-31 12:00:58 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-06-17/13061726000007
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-06-17/13061726000007
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-06-17/13061726000007