My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Young, has encapsulated the argument pretty well. It merely takes a reading of the report from the Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee to see that, although on slightly different bases and for rather different reasons, it is not happy at all with negative procedure for either Clause 8 or Clause 11. In addition to the amendments tabled between us, I have some sympathy with Amendment 10 as well. I very much hope that the Minister will be able to give either convincing reasons for continuing with the negative procedure or will accept the fact that the committee has delivered a pretty strong opinion, particularly in terms of being able to amend primary legislation, and that therefore he will accept or put forward his own amendments to change it to the affirmative procedure in the case of both clauses. Simply reading the committee’s report is pretty persuasive by itself.
Intellectual Property Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Clement-Jones
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 11 June 2013.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Intellectual Property Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
745 c344GC 
Session
2013-14
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2015-03-26 19:29:28 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-06-11/13061188000104
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-06-11/13061188000104
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-06-11/13061188000104