Perhaps I may pursue this a little further. At Second Reading, I raised the point that in terms of intellectual property the grant of copyright or the grant of registered or unregistered design can result in a big improvement in competition. It encourages creativeness and innovation and it encourages the emergence of new competition. On the other hand, competition generally—meaning competition of new and old, old and new—surely means, to re-emphasise the point made by my noble friend Lord Howarth, that if because of the 15 years or any other substantial period general competition is confined and there is no competition for a particular design or copyright area, then the period is too long. In all the studies that have been made, including Hargreaves and so on, I wonder whether the rather vital matter of whether it should be 15 or 10 years or whether it should be so many months has been considered and reconsidered afresh in order to see how applicable these periods of time are for the future.
Intellectual Property Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Borrie
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 11 June 2013.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Intellectual Property Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
745 c328GC 
Session
2013-14
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2015-03-26 19:29:27 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-06-11/13061188000025
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-06-11/13061188000025
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-06-11/13061188000025