UK Parliament / Open data

Growth and Infrastructure Bill

Debate on bills on Wednesday, 24 April 2013, in the House of Lords.
Lords consideration of Commons amendments. Motion A1 insisting on Lords amendment 25 debated. Permission to withdraw objected to. Motion A1 disagreed to on division (168 to 275). Motion A2 debated and withdrawn. Motion A that this House do not insist on its Amendment 25, to which the Commons have disagreed for their Reason 25A, do agree with the Commons in their Amendments 25C, 25D, 25F and 25G to the words restored to the Bill by that disagreement, and do disagree with the Commons in their Amendment 25E to the words so restored but do propose Amendments 25H and 25J in lieu, agreed to on question.
Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
744 cc1397-1469 
Session
2012-13
Legislative stage
Lords amendments and Commons amendments
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Growth and Infrastructure Bill 2012-13. Commons amendments.
Tuesday, 23 April 2013
Bills
House of Lords
Proceeding contributions
Viscount Younger of Leckie | 744 c1442 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Viscount Younger of Leckie:

That this House do not insist on its Amendment 2...

Viscount Younger of Leckie | 744 cc1442-3 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, after a touch of verbal Houdini in reading out the Motion, I hope that I can offer some...


Show all contributions (42)
Lord Burnett | 744 c1443 (Link to this contribution)

Will my noble friend assure the House that no advice should be given to an employee by the law fi...

Viscount Younger of Leckie | 744 cc1443-5 (Link to this contribution)

My noble friend makes an excellent point. That is absolutely true. I can confirm that if any lega...

Baroness Gibson of Market Rasen | 744 c1444 (Link to this contribution)

I should inform the House that if Amendment A1 is agreed to, I shall not be able to call Amendmen...

Lord Pannick | 744 c1444 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Pannick

As an amendment to Motion A, leave out from “House” to end and ...

Lord Pannick | 744 cc1444-7 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am very pleased that the Government have proposed the amendment in lieu in order to i...

Lord Burnett | 744 c1446 (Link to this contribution)

I am most grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, particularly for all his efforts in relation ...

Lord Pannick | 744 cc1446-8 (Link to this contribution)

I would anticipate that when the employee is given advice, one of the terms and effects of the ag...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 744 cc1448-1450 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I pay tribute to my noble friend Lord Younger and to the Chancellor of the Exchequer. W...

Baroness Turner of Camden | 744 c1450 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I also agree that substantial concessions have been made, which have been spelt out by ...

Lord Bilimoria | 744 cc1450-1 (Link to this contribution)

I appreciate that the Government have made several concessions in trying their best, as has been ...

Lord Myners | 744 c1451 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I disagree with one of the comments made by the noble Lord, Lord Bilimoria. I think thi...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 744 c1451 (Link to this contribution)

I defer to the noble Lord’s expertise in tax avoidance and the ways of investment bankers and inv...

Lord Myners | 744 c1452 (Link to this contribution)

The question is whether we give credit to the noble Lord’s noble friend or to your Lordships’ Hou...

Lord Burnett | 744 c1452 (Link to this contribution)

I wonder why, when he was in government, his Government did not introduce a general anti-avoidanc...

Lord Myners | 744 c1452 (Link to this contribution)

I welcome the general avoidance rule, which of course is not the matter that we are discussing. E...

Baroness Brinton | 744 cc1452-4 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I was going to leave the issue of tax loopholes until the end of my contribution, but g...

Lord Christopher | 744 cc1454-5 (Link to this contribution)

I support the noble Lord, Lord Pannick. Although they have moved, with this Bill the Government h...

Lord King of Bridgwater | 744 cc1455-6 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, the Minister ended our previous discussions on this matter by saying that, depending on...

Lord Flight | 744 c1456 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, my noble friend Lord King has summed up the position extremely well. It is of interest ...

Lord Myners | 744 c1456 (Link to this contribution)

Will the noble Lord, Lord Flight, at least acknowledge that the OBR has also expressed serious do...

Lord Flight | 744 c1456 (Link to this contribution)

I thought that what the OBR was effectively saying was that if capital gains tax on these arrange...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 744 c1457 (Link to this contribution)

With all due respect to my noble friend, the tax provisions within the Bill provide for the taxab...

Lord Flight | 744 c1457 (Link to this contribution)

I had indeed understood that that was the point, but if an individual chooses to invest in a fair...

Lord Flight | 744 c1457 (Link to this contribution)

I shall close by repeating the point made by my noble friend Lord King. It is a great credit to t...

Lord Bates | 744 c1457 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I sense the mood of the House, and I will be very brief. One thing needs to be reiterat...

Lord Stewartby | 744 c1458 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I shall be very brief, but there is one point on which I should like confirmation from ...

Lord Adonis | 744 cc1458-1460 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I said at the outset of our debates on this shares-for-rights scheme that it makes the ...

Viscount Younger of Leckie | 744 cc1461-3 (Link to this contribution)

Once again, I thank all noble Lords who have spoken. I can only reiterate that the Government wou...

Lord Christopher | 744 c1463 (Link to this contribution)

The noble Viscount has been very coy about what “reasonable” means. I sought to demonstrate that ...

Viscount Younger of Leckie | 744 c1463 (Link to this contribution)

I believe that I have spelt out the comprehensive and extensive advice that will be on offer to e...

Lord Christopher | 744 c1463 (Link to this contribution)

Who is to determine the result if there is a dispute about the costs involved?

Viscount Younger of Leckie | 744 cc1463-4 (Link to this contribution)

There is deliberately no determining factor. This is a matter which has to be part of a discussio...

Lord Pannick | 744 c1464 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I thank the Minister for all his considerable efforts in securing the comprehensive ame...

Lord Lea of Crondall | 744 c1464 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Lea of Crondall

As an amendment to Motion A, at end insert—

25K: ...

Lord Lea of Crondall | 744 cc1464-8 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, the reason for this Motion is because there is one point which has been made repeatedly...

Lord Morris of Handsworth | 744 c1468 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I support the Motion in the name of my noble friend Lord Lea of Crondall. My support is...

Viscount Younger of Leckie | 744 c1469 (Link to this contribution)

I thank the noble Lords, Lord Morris and Lord Lea, for their interventions. As I made clear in my...

Lord Lea of Crondall | 744 c1469 (Link to this contribution)

I thank the Minister for his reply. Perhaps I should first mention my thanks to my noble friend L...

Baroness D'Souza | 744 c1469 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, after completion of proceedings on the growth Bill, in the Division on the Procedure Co...

Back to top