Parliament can decide that the organisations contracted to do those public functions should have the same restrictions on them, whether that be FOI or anything else, as a corporate body. That can be part of the contract. In a sense, it is a simple issue, and I mean this with absolute respect. I know that lawyers much prefer that these issues are decided in court. I think non-lawyers prefer it to be clear in law, and that is what we believe should happen. We do not want the Derbyshire principle to be eroded, in the words of the noble Lord, Lord Bew, by the threats continuing until a case is brought. For that reason we would like this to be in the Bill, and I would like to test—
Defamation Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 23 April 2013.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Defamation Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
744 c1383 
Session
2012-13
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2016-02-23 10:11:09 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-04-23/13042386000068
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-04-23/13042386000068
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-04-23/13042386000068