UK Parliament / Open data

Jobseekers (Back to Work Schemes) Bill

Debate on bills on Thursday, 21 March 2013, in the House of Lords, led by Lord Freud.
Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
744 cc728-757 
Session
2012-13
Legislative stage
Second reading
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Proceeding contributions
Lord Freud | 744 cc729-730 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, this Bill will ensure that, following the recent Court of Appeal judgment in the case o...

Lord Foulkes of Cumnock | 744 c730 (Link to this contribution)

If the department was so upset and disagreed with the decision, why did it take it so long to bri...


Show all contributions (37)
Lord Freud | 744 cc730-2 (Link to this contribution)

I will come on to explain that in a little.

The arguments that we will make before the Supr...

Lord Foulkes of Cumnock | 744 c732 (Link to this contribution)

As I understand it, this lay in the department without any suggestion of legislation for more tha...

Lord Freud | 744 c732 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, obviously, it is never desirable to have emergency legislation where one can avoid it. ...

Lord McKenzie of Luton | 744 cc732-6 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I thank the Minister for his explanation of the Bill, his officials for our meeting yes...

Lord German | 744 cc736-8 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I want to address the Bill itself, but before I do that I want to make a few comments o...

Lord Foulkes of Cumnock | 744 c738 (Link to this contribution)

Could the noble Lord help me? I remember when the Liberal Democrats were on this side of the Hous...

Lord German | 744 c738 (Link to this contribution)

Yes, I will. It is perfectly obvious that the noble Lord’s party did the same thing when it was i...

Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 744 c738 (Link to this contribution)

In the opening stages of the noble Lord’s speech, which was very interesting, he referred to rema...

Lord German | 744 c738 (Link to this contribution)

Certainly. It was col. 825, about half way down towards the bottom of the page.

Lord Crickhowell | 744 c738 (Link to this contribution)

On the point about paragraph 12, as a member of the Constitution Committee I raise the point that...

Lord German | 744 cc738-9 (Link to this contribution)

I fully accept that. The issue raised by paragraph 12 is why the Government rejected the other op...

Lord Pannick | 744 cc739-742 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, this Bill contravenes two fundamental constitutional principles. First, it is being fas...

Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 744 cc741-5 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, like others in this House and like my noble friend Lord McKenzie, I have been in the Mi...

Lord Bach | 744 cc745-6 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, it is hard to think of a more unattractive, more unappealing and more unworthy Bill tha...

Baroness Lister of Burtersett | 744 cc746-9 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I support the amendment in the name of my noble friend Lord McKenzie of Luton. The amen...

Baroness Sherlock | 744 cc749-750 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, what a sorry state of affairs we find ourselves in. I almost feel sorry for the Ministe...

Lord Freud | 744 c750 (Link to this contribution)

The point that was being made by the SSAC about the width was that it meant that it was not neces...

Baroness Sherlock | 744 cc750-1 (Link to this contribution)

I thank the Minister for explaining that, but of course it was on precisely the fact that parliam...

Baroness Sherlock | 744 cc751-2 (Link to this contribution)

I am so sorry, I could not catch what the noble Lord said from a sedentary position. Let me share...

Lord Freud | 744 cc752-3 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I thank noble Lords for their valuable and interesting contributions. I need to registe...

Lord Pannick | 744 c753 (Link to this contribution)

Will the Minister explain how it can be fair or a question of windfall when these claimants had n...

Lord Freud | 744 cc753-4 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, it was clearly laid down in the primary legislation that that was an expectation, and t...

Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 744 c754 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, surely the Minister has accepted his own department’s research that up to two-thirds of...

Lord Freud | 744 c754 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I agree with the noble Baroness on this—the sanctions have not been well designed. We a...

Lord Low of Dalston | 744 c754 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, can the Minister help me on one point? I have been listening very carefully to what he ...

Lord Freud | 744 c754 (Link to this contribution)

As noble Lords know, we are seeking leave to appeal to the Supreme Court to test that specific ma...

Lord Foulkes of Cumnock | 744 c754 (Link to this contribution)

The noble Lord is repeating word for word what he said in his introductory speech. Why does he no...

Lord Freud | 744 c755 (Link to this contribution)

I am doing my best to explain the reason why this is exceptional. I did not explain it in detail ...

Lord Pannick | 744 c755 (Link to this contribution)

I thank the Minister, who has been very kind. I have one more question for him. He says that it i...

Lord Freud | 744 cc755-6 (Link to this contribution)

The moment that there is a ruling—if there were to be a ruling—against the department, we would b...

Baroness Lister of Burtersett | 744 c756 (Link to this contribution)

I quite understand that the noble Lord has not been able to answer all the questions that were as...

Lord Freud | 744 c757 (Link to this contribution)

I have done my best to answer them. We will have a chance to go through some of these issues agai...

Lord McKenzie of Luton | 744 c757 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who have spoken in support of the amendment. I say to the Minis...

Back to top