The noble Lord is a signatory to this amendment. He is speaking for the Official Opposition and it obviously represents a cost. I wonder what that cost is. I do not see how the House can vote if it is not clear what extra costs are envisaged. If he is suggesting that there is no extra cost at all, I do not imagine the Government will find great difficulty with the amendment. Presumably there is a cost; I wonder if he knows the figure.
Welfare Benefits Up-rating Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord King of Bridgwater
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 19 March 2013.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Welfare Benefits Up-rating Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
744 c534 
Session
2012-13
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2013-11-20 11:31:17 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-03-19/13031982000016
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-03-19/13031982000016
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-03-19/13031982000016