My Lords, yesterday in this Committee we debated a report from the noble Lord, Lord Goodlad, in relation to the Government’s procedures for consultation. Considerable concern was expressed by the committee that he chairs, shared by those of us who spoke in the debate, who were either members of the committee or, as in my case and that of the noble Earl, Lord Lytton, not members of the committee, that the period for consultation had been arbitrarily changed by the Government last year. Quite apart from the merits of today’s statutory instrument, today’s business confirms the criticisms that were made about the consultation period. As the Minister has pointed out, consultation on these changes took place in only a four-week period, beginning towards the end of October, before the newly elected police commissioners, for example, were even elected. So all 43 of them have had no opportunity of commenting on these changes in an area in which it might be thought that they have a significant interest. It clearly crossed nobody’s mind—and I am not blaming the Minister for this—
Criminal Justice Act 2003 (Conditional Cautions: Code of Practice) Order 2013
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Beecham
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 12 March 2013.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Criminal Justice Act 2003 (Conditional Cautions: Code of Practice) Order 2013.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
744 c80GC 
Session
2012-13
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2014-07-29 11:49:51 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-03-12/13031266000030
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-03-12/13031266000030
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-03-12/13031266000030