UK Parliament / Open data

Defamation Bill

Proceeding contribution from Lord Lucas (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 19 December 2012. It occurred during Debate on bills and Committee proceeding on Defamation Bill.

My Lords, my noble friend in his speech, and my other noble friend subsequently, convinced me that my Amendment 16A was misguided, so I shall not pursue it. However, I will ask my noble friend how he thinks his Amendment 14, and in particular the words “reasonably believed”, will apply to Twitter. It is a common function of Twitter that one passes on interesting news, sometimes with an added comment of one’s own, attributing it to a source generally rather than appropriating it for oneself. Would one be expected, under this amendment, to pursue inquiries as to whether one believed the source, or the particular information; or will it be sufficient to reasonably believe that the place you got it from is likely to be reliable?

2 pm

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
741 c549GC 
Session
2012-13
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Back to top