UK Parliament / Open data

Defamation Bill

Proceeding contribution from Lord Mawhinney (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 17 December 2012. It occurred during Debate on bills and Committee proceeding on Defamation Bill.

I am grateful to the noble and learned Lord. I quite understand the argument. If the guidance issued were to say, for example, that evidence had to be produced within a given—probably short—timeframe, which would have cost benefits, would that fall foul of the arrangement?

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
741 c419GC 
Session
2012-13
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Back to top