I am a bit confused. If the noble Lord absolutely agrees with me on the primacy of integrity, he cannot have read proposed new Section 1B(4) of FiSMA or he would not be content to oppose these amendments. New Section 1B(4) clearly states that the three objectives are equal but one is more equal than others—namely, competition. If he agrees with me and if one is going to be more equal than others, it should be integrity.
Financial Services Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Phillips of Sudbury
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 12 November 2012.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Financial Services Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
740 c1295
Session
2012-13
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-11-26 10:23:12 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2012-11-12/12111212000141
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2012-11-12/12111212000141
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2012-11-12/12111212000141