UK Parliament / Open data

Justice and Security Bill [HL]

Clauses 6 to 9 agreed to. New clauses considered.
Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
739 cc119-180 
Session
2012-13
Department
Ministry of Justice
Legislative stage
Committee stage
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Proceeding contributions
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 739 c120 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts

53: Clause 6, page 5, line 18, at end insert—...

Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 739 cc120-1 (Link to this contribution)

Amendment 53 is a simple amendment, which merely inserts at the end of Clause 6(7) a definition f...


Show all contributions (98)
Lord Deben | 739 cc121-2 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I rise to support this amendment in much the same way as it was presented. In other wor...

Marquess of Lothian | 739 c123 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I have very mixed feelings about this amendment. I said in my speech at Second Reading ...

Earl of Erroll | 739 c123 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I shall make a couple of topical points in support of the noble Lord, Lord Deben. This ...

Baroness Manningham-Buller | 739 cc123-4 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I say to the noble Lord, Lord Hodgson, that I certainly did not say that I knew all the...

Earl of Erroll | 739 c124 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, there was one thing I forgot to say. It is important to the noble Lord, Lord Hodgson. I...

Lord Thomas of Gresford | 739 c125 (Link to this contribution)

I think that is too narrow a definition of the Pepper v Hart principle. I seem to recollect that ...

Lord Beecham | 739 cc125-6 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Hodgson, is too modest in proclaiming that this is a simple amendm...

Marquess of Lothian | 739 c126 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, Clause 6(2) states:

“The court must, on an application … make such a declaration ...

Lord Beecham | 739 c127 (Link to this contribution)

It would, but the court would be assisted perhaps by an approach in which the Government in advan...

Lord Faulks | 739 c127 (Link to this contribution)

The noble Lord said that the party opposite is not yet convinced of the need for CMPs, and he mad...

Lord Beecham | 739 c128 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, we are capable of simple arithmetic, and it may be that, in reality, the Government wil...

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 739 cc128-9 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am grateful to my noble friend Lord Hodgson for bringing forward the amendment. It is...

Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 739 c129 (Link to this contribution)

The noble and learned Lord just said that the special advocates could make representations to the...

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 739 cc129-130 (Link to this contribution)

I think that my noble friend has an amendment later where we can explore this more fully. It is t...

Lord Pannick | 739 c130 (Link to this contribution)

Can the Minister confirm that the concept of national security under the Bill is deliberately int...

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 739 c130 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, for the purpose of closed material proceedings and what we are dealing with here, natio...

Lord Lester of Herne Hill | 739 cc130-1 (Link to this contribution)

I have two points. I do not understand why it is necessary to refer to Article 6 of the conventio...

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 739 c131 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I hope that Clause 11(5)(c) is not troublesome because it is intended to be the opposit...

Lord Elystan-Morgan | 739 c131 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I thank the noble and learned Lord and I apologise for the fact that I missed the openi...

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 739 cc132-3 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I will certainly mull over that point. However, in coming up with any definition, we wo...

Lord Butler of Brockwell | 739 c133 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, in supporting the noble and learned Lord’s argument that the definition should not be t...

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 739 cc133-4 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, the Green Paper suggested that there might well be the category of the prevention of se...

Lord Beecham | 739 c134 (Link to this contribution)

I particularly had in mind ruling out areas—the noble and learned Lord has already indicated some...

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 739 c134 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I hear what the noble Lord says. I have already tried in response to the debate to indi...

Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 739 c134 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I began by saying that I did not believe that this was an open-and-shut case, and so it...

Baroness Manningham-Buller | 739 c134 (Link to this contribution)

I take it as a compliment. It just sounded as though I had been boasting, and I would not want to...

Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 739 c135 (Link to this contribution)

It certainly was not boasting. It was my remark, not any remark the noble Baroness made to me. I ...

Lord Thomas of Gresford | 739 c135 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Thomas of Gresford

54: After Clause 6, insert the following new Clause—...

Lord Thomas of Gresford | 739 cc135-6 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, this amendment is concerned with an anomaly that was revealed in the case of Evans v Mi...

Lord Pannick | 739 c136 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, would the noble Lord clarify whether the court accepted the argument that it was outsid...

Lord Thomas of Gresford | 739 c136 (Link to this contribution)

As I understand it, the court did not accept the argument.

Lord Beecham | 739 c136 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord for a clear explanation of something which, I am afraid...

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 739 cc136-8 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am grateful to my noble friend for bringing forward this amendment. He rightly points...

Lord Thomas of Gresford | 739 c137 (Link to this contribution)

I am most grateful to my noble friend for indicating that he will look at these cases. In the lig...

Lord Dubs | 739 c137 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Dubs

54A: After Clause 6, insert the following new Clause—

“Indep...

Lord Dubs | 739 cc137-9 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, let us suppose that we have the first case heard or not heard in public under these new...

Lord Lloyd of Berwick | 739 c139 (Link to this contribution)

I have not had much time to consider this amendment but, on the face of it, it seems attractive. ...

Lord Faulks | 739 c140 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, very briefly, while the idea of having those who are not the primary judges assisting t...

Lord Pannick | 739 c140 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I share the concerns of the noble Lord, Lord Dubs, about the fundamental unfairness of ...

Lord Carlile of Berriew | 739 c140 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I fully understand the concerns that have been expressed by the noble Lord, Lord Dubs, ...

Lord Elystan-Morgan | 739 c141 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, the motivations behind this amendment are, I have no doubt, noble, honourable and sensi...

Lord Lester of Herne Hill | 739 cc141-2 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, in later amendments, we will be considering ways of making what at the moment is an unf...

Lord Beecham | 739 c142 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I pay tribute to my noble friend Lord Dubs, who has served with great distinction on th...

Lord Elystan-Morgan | 739 c142 (Link to this contribution)

There are no county court judges. There have not been any since the Courts Act 1971. They are now...

Lord Beecham | 739 c142 (Link to this contribution)

It is a while since I appeared before any judge whether county court or circuit. I meant the equi...

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 739 cc142-4 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Beecham, anticipated what the response would be. That said, it is ...

Lord Lester of Herne Hill | 739 c144 (Link to this contribution)

Will my noble and learned friend reassure the Committee that it is not part of the Government’s a...

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 739 c144 (Link to this contribution)

I hope I indicated that we do not want to create something that is entirely different—some sort o...

Lord Dubs | 739 c144 (Link to this contribution)

I am grateful to the noble and learned Lord for his response, as I am to the noble and learned Lo...

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 739 c144 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, these would be civil proceedings, which would be presided over by a single judge in any...

Lord Dubs | 739 c144 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, that is fair enough but the point of the judicial commissioners would be to help in est...

Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 739 c144 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts

55: Clause 7, page 5, line 28, leave out “is ...

Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 739 cc145-7 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, in moving Amendment 55 I shall speak also to Amendments 56, 63, 64, 65, 66 and 67. This...

Baroness Williams of Crosby | 739 c146 (Link to this contribution)

I mention again that I am not a lawyer, but I have the greatest respect for the noble Lord, Lord ...

Baroness Berridge | 739 cc146-8 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I support two particular aspects of this group of amendments. Following the comments of...

Lord Pannick | 739 cc148-9 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, my answer to the point made by the noble Baroness, Lady Williams of Crosby, is that reg...

Lord Thomas of Gresford | 739 c149 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, it also raises a very interesting question about which all lawyers will be concerned: w...

Lord Faulks | 739 c149 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, the whole role of the special advocate is inherently unsatisfactory and is an exception...

Lord Gold | 739 c149 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am concerned that, if the special advocate is made responsible, there is a greater ri...

Baroness Manningham-Buller | 739 c149 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I want to comment on one of the amendments in this group. Looking at the first part of ...

Lord Lester of Herne Hill | 739 c150 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I would just point out that Amendment 62, which has not been included with this group o...

Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames | 739 c150 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I had not intended to intervene in this debate, but having heard the noble Lord, Lord P...

Lord Beecham | 739 cc150-3 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, this is an important group of amendments, as are the amendments to follow which deal wi...

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 739 cc152-7 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, this has been a very important debate on the role of the special advocates in the proce...

Lord Beecham | 739 c154 (Link to this contribution)

I wonder whether the noble and learned Lord could deal with this matter by accepting a slight mod...

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 739 c154 (Link to this contribution)

That is a helpful suggestion. I am always wary of saying that, as it might cast doubt on what has...

Lord Lester of Herne Hill | 739 c154 (Link to this contribution)

I appreciate that there is always the danger of what Lord Wilberforce once described as the “aust...

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 739 c158 (Link to this contribution)

I would want to reflect on what the “austerity of tabulated legalism” actually means. We have had...

Baroness Berridge | 739 c158 (Link to this contribution)

Following on from the point made by my noble friend Lord Lester about the overriding objective to...

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 739 cc158-160 (Link to this contribution)

The point I was making to my noble friend is that we are dealing with a rare and exceptional circ...

Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 739 cc160-1 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, this was a menu of issues that I felt we ought to discuss today. I am exceptionally gra...

Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 739 c161 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts

57: Clause 7, page 5, line 31, leave out para...

Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 739 c161 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am afraid that I have another group of amendments. In moving Amendment 57, I will als...

Viscount Ullswater | 739 c161 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I must advise your Lordships that if this amendment is agreed to, I will not be able to...

Lord Thomas of Gresford | 739 c162 (Link to this contribution)

I speak to Amendment 58 in my name and that of my noble friend Lady Hamwee. Clause 7(1) contains ...

Lord Pannick | 739 cc162-4 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am certainly not the heavy artillery to which the noble Lord, Lord Hodgson, referred,...

Lord Lester of Herne Hill | 739 cc164-5 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, my name appears on some of these amendments, and I will briefly make a couple of points...

Baroness Kennedy of the Shaws | 739 c165 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I agree with my legal colleagues in this House about the need for gisting as a step tow...

Lord Carlile of Berriew | 739 cc165-6 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, perhaps I may take a few moments to make four short points in support of Amendment 62, ...

Lord Judd | 739 cc166-7 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, perhaps it is an appropriate moment for someone who is not a lawyer to add a lay man’s ...

Baroness Williams of Crosby | 739 cc167-8 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I should like to follow the noble Lord, Lord Judd, in what one might call a very short ...

Lord Ashdown of Norton-sub-Hamdon | 739 c168 (Link to this contribution)

I have not been here today as much as I might have been and I am grateful to my noble friend for ...

Baroness Williams of Crosby | 739 cc168-9 (Link to this contribution)

I am grateful to my noble friend. Nobody knows more directly and more at first hand than he exact...

Lord Faulks | 739 cc169-170 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, it is a great privilege to follow the noble Baroness and I am sorry to bring an end to ...

Baroness Berridge | 739 cc170-1 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I will speak briefly in support of Amendment 62. My noble and learned friend the Minist...

Lord Beecham | 739 cc171-2 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, the noble Baroness, Lady Berridge, has identified and emphasised the crucial nature of ...

Lord Lester of Herne Hill | 739 c172 (Link to this contribution)

Is the noble Lord aware of a case I once did, Tinnelly and McElduff v UK, where there was a concl...

Lord Beecham | 739 cc172-3 (Link to this contribution)

I am grateful to the noble Lord, who brings another example of precisely the same point made in t...

Lord Butler of Brockwell | 739 c173 (Link to this contribution)

Does the noble Lord think that it is a demonstration of damage being done that the Government hav...

Lord Beecham | 739 c173 (Link to this contribution)

There cannot be two winners in these situations. It is certainly less than satisfactory that a ca...

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 739 cc174-8 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am grateful both to my noble friends and other noble Lords who brought these amendmen...

Lord Lester of Herne Hill | 739 c178 (Link to this contribution)

My difficulty with my noble and learned friend’s reply is that he keeps saying: “I hope that Memb...

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 739 cc178-9 (Link to this contribution)

I understand the point being made by my noble friend, but what is in the Bill goes beyond a minis...

Lord Judd | 739 c179 (Link to this contribution)

The noble and learned Lord in his full reply referred to the special advocates being on board and...

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 739 cc179-180 (Link to this contribution)

I fully accept—and it was said from this Dispatch Box in earlier debates—that it is very much see...

Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 739 c180 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, the length of the debate and the breadth and depth of contributions have indicated how ...

Back to top