My Lords, I have an amendment in this group. I am in full support of the noble Lord, Lord Browne. My amendments dovetail entirely with what he has just said. I want to drop subsections (3) and (4) of Clause 5 because, in this media age, the idea that an investigation report will be published and that the identity of the retailer will not come out is not workable. Again, it feeds the whole world of suspicion, innuendo and investigation of another kind. On subsection (4), if a retailer’s name is given, apart from the reasons for the decision having been given, the retailer would have been given an opportunity to make a comment and to know which way the report was going, as is normal in order that it could be agreed by one and all to be a well balanced and fair report.
Groceries Code Adjudicator Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Viscount Eccles
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 26 June 2012.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Groceries Code Adjudicator Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
738 c120GC 
Session
2012-13
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-11-28 15:09:07 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2012-06-26/120626127000115
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2012-06-26/120626127000115
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2012-06-26/120626127000115