My Lords, I wish to state clearly that I do not agree with the arguments of my noble friend Lord Howard of Rising. If there had been a robbery, would we ever argue that a witness to that robbery could not give evidence to the police and that the only people who could do so would be either the robber or the victim? We have to open this out so that the general principles on which we base so many issues of this nature in society apply, so that other people are allowed to make complaints. I give one example: there are plenty of organisations in civic society that might wish to make a complaint on behalf of a supplier in this case. I remind noble Lords that other aspects of the Bill ensure that it is not in your interest to make vexatious complaints. The adjudicator can, at his or her discretion, apply costs against those who do so. I am absolutely sure that a supplier who sought an advantage against another supplier in the way that has been suggested would be the subject of that kind of cost.
Groceries Code Adjudicator Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Randerson
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 26 June 2012.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Groceries Code Adjudicator Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
738 c114GC 
Session
2012-13
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-11-28 15:09:05 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2012-06-26/120626127000086
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2012-06-26/120626127000086
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2012-06-26/120626127000086