In her Mansion House speech, the Chancellor announced that we would change the emphasis of regulation from risk to growth. The FCA and PRA have effectively regulated the London market into terminal decline, embedding Stonewall philosophy and diversity, equity and inclusion into financial regulation, starting with the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. That was followed by the markets in financial instruments directives I and II, which imported EU regulation into the London market, prioritising a European bank lending model over our equity capital market tradition. Given that regulators cannot regulate for growth, the only solution is to disband the FCA and PRA, and return to the light-touch regulation under the Bank of England that secured London’s position as a vibrant capital market until 2000. Could the Minister explain with clarity the Government’s strategy of regulating for growth, which appears to me to be an oxymoron?
Financial Services: Mansion House Speech
Proceeding contribution from
Rupert Lowe
(Reform UK)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 18 November 2024.
It occurred during Ministerial statement on Financial Services: Mansion House Speech.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
757 c67 
Session
2024-25
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-11-21 15:08:39 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2024-11-18/24111833000041
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2024-11-18/24111833000041
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2024-11-18/24111833000041