The proof of the safety is in the binding international treaty between two international partners, namely the United Kingdom and the Government of Rwanda. The treaty addresses the concerns set out by the Supreme Court, namely the concerns in and around refoulement, and I invite this House to accept that reassurance. That is why I say the amendments are unnecessary.
Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Michael Tomlinson
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 22 April 2024.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
748 c667 
Session
2023-24
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-23 12:48:46 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2024-04-22/24042219000065
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2024-04-22/24042219000065
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2024-04-22/24042219000065