I am listening to the hon. Gentleman’s speech carefully, and he is making some excellent points. Will he join me in deploring the methods by which organisations avoid their responsibilities to many of our constituents? For example, the business of my constituent George Dosoo, LD Partnership, took on a loan from RBS, now NatWest. In 2012, he discovered that a sum of £150,000 was removed without authority from the partnership account. Despite George obtaining recent legal opinion indicating that his case has merit, NatWest maintains that the case is time-barred and will not reopen it. Does the hon. Gentleman agree that time-barring is another device that is far too often used by businesses and institutions to deliberately undermine our constituents’ ability to obtain recourse?
Access to Redress Schemes
Proceeding contribution from
Deidre Brock
(Scottish National Party)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 18 April 2024.
It occurred during Backbench debate on Access to Redress Schemes.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
748 c475 
Session
2023-24
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-07-30 12:21:53 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2024-04-18/24041824000150
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2024-04-18/24041824000150
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2024-04-18/24041824000150