May I just respond to the other point that has been made? It is vital that this issue is considered properly and deeply. I hope very much that, if we are successful today, the debate will continue into Committee, so that further consideration may be given to that issue. At the moment, I am erring on the side of what is suggested by my private Member’s Bill. I think the Bill strikes a balance. It is not quite accurate to talk about subjectivity and objectivity, because a judge will have to make a determination on the facts that are presented and his knowledge of how the case is being conducted. At the moment I err in favour of saying that there is a false dichotomy, but it is something that should be considered further in Committee.
Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Wayne David
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Friday, 23 February 2024.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
745 c953 
Session
2023-24
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-02-26 09:27:42 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2024-02-23/2402239000026
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2024-02-23/2402239000026
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2024-02-23/2402239000026