UK Parliament / Open data

Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill

Has it escaped the hon. Gentleman’s notice that one claim was dismissed by the Supreme Court judgment on Rwanda? That was an Iraqi in the case of ASM. The reason was very simple: the Court made it crystal clear in paragraph 144 of its judgment that the issue in question, as far as that claimant was concerned, was undermined by clear and unambiguous words in an Act of Parliament. In other words, the sovereignty of Parliament prevailed.

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
743 c719 
Session
2023-24
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Back to top