My hon. Friend makes a strong point about safety being designed, but a secondary area of concern for many people is discrimination—that is, the more data companies acquire, the greater their ability to discriminate. For example, in an insurance context, we allow companies to discriminate on the basis of experience or behaviour; if someone has had a lot of crashes or speeding fines, we allow discrimination. However, for companies that process large amounts of data and may be making automated decisions or otherwise, there is no openly advertised line of acceptability drawn. In the future it may be that datasets come together that allow extreme levels of discrimination. For example, if they linked data science, psychometrics and genetic data, there is the possibility for significant levels of discrimination in society. Does he think that, as well as safety, we should be emphasising that line in the sand?
Data Protection and Digital Information (No. 2) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Kit Malthouse
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 17 April 2023.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Data Protection and Digital Information (No. 2) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
731 c83 
Session
2022-23
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-06-21 10:35:38 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2023-04-17/23041764000017
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2023-04-17/23041764000017
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2023-04-17/23041764000017