In October 2020, the then International Trade Secretary—the current Foreign Secretary—set out the CRaG process for Parliament to have a say in the scrutiny of international treaties. This procedure should allow Parliament 21 sitting days to scrutinise the final text. It is disgraceful that adequate time has not been allocated for proper parliamentary debate in this Chamber and scrutiny of the first trade deal to be negotiated from scratch—the Australia-UK free trade agreement. Is it not the case that the Government are becoming arrogant and no longer feel that they need to be accountable to Parliament for their actions? What sort of precedent does this set for the scrutiny of trade agreements?
Australia-UK Free Trade Agreement: Scrutiny
Proceeding contribution from
Mark Hendrick
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 19 July 2022.
It occurred during Urgent question on Australia-UK Free Trade Agreement: Scrutiny.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
718 c848 
Session
2022-23
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-01-04 16:51:34 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2022-07-19/22071928000028
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2022-07-19/22071928000028
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2022-07-19/22071928000028