I am happy to confirm that to the hon. Gentleman, who I know has taken a great interest in this project. It is important to be clear with the House today that taking the Sponsor Body back in-house and back under the control of the House does not rule out any option. It does not rule out the option of a decant of 20 years. What I am saying to the House is that I do not think that that is a deliverable option. We need to look at some more practical measures, and I will come to that later in my speech. It is difficult to comprehend how we can deliver a project of this magnitude without some form of decant, but I am not an expert and, as the hon. Gentleman says, lots of Members are not experts in this field, so we need the delivery authority, which will have that expertise, to guide us and to come to those decisions very quickly.
Restoration and Renewal of the Palace of Westminster
Proceeding contribution from
Mark Spencer
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 12 July 2022.
It occurred during Debate on Restoration and Renewal of the Palace of Westminster.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
718 c273 
Session
2022-23
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-07-14 11:15:56 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2022-07-12/22071279000014
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2022-07-12/22071279000014
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2022-07-12/22071279000014