Let me go back to the fact that the Prime Minister can say no to the initiation of an independent investigation. What happens if the independent investigator asks the Prime Minister to publish his reasons? Is the Prime Minister compelled to do that? Similarly, given that the Prime Minister has said all along that no rules were broken, what is to stop him breaking rules in the future and saying, “No, we don’t need an investigation because I can assure you that no rules have been broken.”? Where are the checks and balances there?
Standards in Public Life
Proceeding contribution from
Alan Brown
(Scottish National Party)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 7 June 2022.
It occurred during Opposition day on Standards in Public Life.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
715 c688 
Session
2022-23
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-07-18 12:30:17 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2022-06-07/22060718000297
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2022-06-07/22060718000297
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2022-06-07/22060718000297