On that point, targeted missiles of the kind we have seen launched at tanks at short range are an answer, but the argument in favour of moving to NATO calibre 155 is that, all things considered—of course shells come in different specifications—it offers slightly longer range. By using longer range, the Ukrainians can stay out of Russian 152 range and target them with their 155s, potentially forcing a change in Russian tactics. There is benefit in moving to NATO calibre as well as in directed missiles.
Ukraine
Proceeding contribution from
Bob Seely
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 26 April 2022.
It occurred during Debate on Ukraine.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
712 c677 
Session
2021-22
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-04-27 15:40:09 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2022-04-26/22042653000062
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2022-04-26/22042653000062
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2022-04-26/22042653000062